Were might be a better word but this argument with you is a waste of my time anywayMaybe you would like to say when the disciples were saved?
Were might be a better word but this argument with you is a waste of my time anywayMaybe you would like to say when the disciples were saved?
Maybe you would like to say when the disciples were saved?
We know from John 20:21-23, that Jesus gave them the Holy Spirit.When God drew them
There isn't a when in the past, present and future happening at the same time. Time was created so you can boast about your salvation forgetting when, how, why and what of God. The problem with arminians is that they should never been behind times to begin with. They think they create salvation and invented man made free will that don't even exist
Were might be a better word but this argument with you is a waste of my time anyway
Never did cause conversation can happen anytime to anyone.
I would tend to agree with this. I don't think we can definitively know from Scripture exactly when an individual apostle was given saving faith.They were fulfilled at Pentecost and sealed by the Holy Spirit. Previous to that, they were loyal, they had faith and they loved Christ.
I would tend to agree with this. I don't think we can definitively know from Scripture exactly when an individual apostle was given saving faith.
John 20:22 - is an action where Jesus breathed on the apostles and gave them His Holy Spirit, even if only a taste of His Spirit, for that particular moment.
I would tend to agree with this. I don't think we can definitively know from Scripture exactly when an individual apostle was given saving faith.
John 20:22 - is an action where Jesus breathed on the apostles and gave them His Holy Spirit, even if only a taste of His Spirit, for that particular moment.
They were fulfilled at Pentecost and sealed by the Holy Spirit. Previous to that, they were loyal, they had faith and they loved Christ.
Obviously then you don't believe the shed blood of Jesus Christ mounted to anything but to bring on salvation at Pentecost? Thay all had to wait another 50 days.
Try and remain focused. The discussion is based on, "When were the Disciples saved?" You just changed the subject.
When they were saved was the question. The "when" happened before the birth of God's elects or the saved one. Everyone bickers about the past and the future which doesn't exist in the present. No one seems interested in what the holy spirit does in real time. The living God doesn't make sense to the carnal TOL'ers so wrapped up in themselves while preaching pure boasting to pride themselves with manual free will making them gods.We know from John 20:21-23, that Jesus gave them the Holy Spirit.
Agreed, when we are talking doctrine of salvation. In the case of CR's question, we also must say that Scripture is not clear as to when they received saving faith, in real time. I am willing to be corrected on this though.When they were saved was the question. The "when" happened before the birth of God's elects or the saved one. Everyone bickers about the past and the future which doesn't exist in the present. No one seems interested in what the holy spirit does in real time. The living God doesn't make sense to the carnal TOL'ers so wrapped up in themselves while preaching pure boasting to pride themselves with manual free will making them gods.
I'd need a re-wording of this question.What is wrong with believing that it was the very first indwelling, as in being born again, of the Holy Spirit experienced by anyone, salvation having already happened?
Agreed, when we are talking doctrine of salvation. In the case of CR's question, we also must say that Scripture is not clear as to when they received saving faith, in real time. I am willing to be corrected on this though.
When they were saved was the question. The "when" happened before the birth of God's elects or the saved one. Everyone bickers about the past and the future which doesn't exist in the present. No one seems interested in what the holy spirit does in real time. The living God doesn't make sense to the carnal TOL'ers so wrapped up in themselves while preaching pure boasting to pride themselves with manual free will making them gods.
It's probably me, however, I don't understand the question.Why not consider receiving something "special" of something everyone gets automatically at birth, isn't necessary?
Why not consider receiving something "special" of something everyone gets automatically at birth, isn't necessary?