You stick to your out of Scripture stuff; and I'll cling to Christ the Truth!! - Jesus is the Book of the Law, Resurrected, and made New in the Testimony of the Bool of Life / Christ!!
Paul -- 030513
well said brother. Amen.
You stick to your out of Scripture stuff; and I'll cling to Christ the Truth!! - Jesus is the Book of the Law, Resurrected, and made New in the Testimony of the Bool of Life / Christ!!
Paul -- 030513
~*~*~
May the blessings of divine gnosis continue
Perhaps LA would actually continue to engage his threads INSTEAD of continually CLOSING them, which seems pointless, since it prevents or retards any constructive discussion from ensuing. This seems like a 'retarded' thing to do, unless LA can justify his actions by some tenable wisdom. I openly question this tactic, since it is anti-thetical to the purpose of the forum. If you'd like to continue such posts in your TOL blog, that might be more appropriate, since it would only use up blog-space, and people could still reply with comments thereon. Otherwise we just fill this particular forum with a string of dead-skeleton threads,...or 'clutter'.
In the meantime,...the earliest schools of Gnostic theology (more or less) developed their own terms and meanings, amid a more wonderful cosmology, to which later formalized forms of Christianity became hostile towards, branding such as 'heresy', as their own 'orthodoxy' was worshipped as being beyond error. In the religious candy-store, often the more polished or brandied of sweets, takes the cake so to speak.
While we as more liberal 'gnostics' enjoy the language of myth and metaphor, we also recognize the utter mystery of the unknown or 'unknowable' ever before us. The little glimmerings of light (illumination/revelation) that appears amid the great infinite darkness or void, are but little light-posts along way, giving us some glimpse into the nature of things, whose radiance seems as the purest white Radiant LIGHT outshining all, but there is still ever the infinite darkness or womb of the cosmos from whence all comes into being, yet itself remains beyond or prior to any knowledge of definition. One must dive DEEPER to gather these pearls, and even then,...they may elude you. Hence some of the mystics calling such deep meditative states as the 'cloud of unknowing'.
So, ....there is the more primal IGNORANCE, at the heart of existence, an original 'agnosis' that is prior to any arising of knowledge of definition whatsoever. It is that reality before even a definition of 'God' arises, where all following definitions of 'God' or 'any-thing' for that matter emerge as a play of mind.
In any case,...lest we go on,....the primal Mystery of Being is yours to consider and en-JOY. But along the way,...don't knock yourself out,...and do be considerate in the 'manner' in which you speak. You can speak kindly without exclamations to communicate your points, if indeed they are valid, since they will speak for themselves beyond any punctuation. Isn't that a rational approach? I also ask that you do NOT close this thread, since Gnosticism and its 'scriptures' is worthy of discussion.
pj
~*~*~
May the blessings of divine gnosis continue
Perhaps LA would actually continue to engage his threads INSTEAD of continually CLOSING them, which seems pointless, since it prevents or retards any constructive discussion from ensuing. This seems like a 'retarded' thing to do, unless LA can justify his actions by some tenable wisdom. I openly question this tactic, since it is anti-thetical to the purpose of the forum. If you'd like to continue such posts in your TOL blog, that might be more appropriate, since it would only use up blog-space, and people could still reply with comments thereon. Otherwise we just fill this particular forum with a string of dead-skeleton threads,...or 'clutter'.
In the meantime,...the earliest schools of Gnostic theology (more or less) developed their own terms and meanings, amid a more wonderful cosmology, to which later formalized forms of Christianity became hostile towards, branding such as 'heresy', as their own 'orthodoxy' was worshipped as being beyond error. In the religious candy-store, often the more polished or brandied of sweets, takes the cake so to speak.
While we as more liberal 'gnostics' enjoy the language of myth and metaphor, we also recognize the utter mystery of the unknown or 'unknowable' ever before us. The little glimmerings of light (illumination/revelation) that appears amid the great infinite darkness or void, are but little light-posts along way, giving us some glimpse into the nature of things, whose radiance seems as the purest white Radiant LIGHT outshining all, but there is still ever the infinite darkness or womb of the cosmos from whence all comes into being, yet itself remains beyond or prior to any knowledge of definition. One must dive DEEPER to gather these pearls, and even then,...they may elude you. Hence some of the mystics calling such deep meditative states as the 'cloud of unknowing'.
So, ....there is the more primal IGNORANCE, at the heart of existence, an original 'agnosis' that is prior to any arising of knowledge of definition whatsoever. It is that reality before even a definition of 'God' arises, where all following definitions of 'God' or 'any-thing' for that matter emerge as a play of mind.
In any case,...lest we go on,....the primal Mystery of Being is yours to consider and en-JOY. But along the way,...don't knock yourself out,...and do be considerate in the 'manner' in which you speak. You can speak kindly without exclamations to communicate your points, if indeed they are valid, since they will speak for themselves beyond any punctuation. Isn't that a rational approach? I also ask that you do NOT close this thread, since Gnosticism and its 'scriptures' is worthy of discussion.
pj
There are no such things as “Heavenly Gnostic Scriptures”!!
If one were to exclude anything that was ever 'specifically' considered as being "Gnostic Scripture", that would necessarily have to apply to the Pauline Letters and the Gospel of Luke as well.well said brother. Amen.
The shadow of the third Century reflects the error of the literal being forced on the illiterate masses, a good indication that it was the falling away from the Ancient Method of the prior Gnostic light of interpretation scoffed at by those fear programmed converts.
Yet if the curtain be pulled the rulers themselves interpret the scripture through the allegorical light they speak against to the lower levels of their religious/governed-mentalist pyramid.