So you don't have any evidence to support your assertion that immigration policy has always been anti assimilation....thought so.So you don't have any actual evidence to support your assertion.
Thought so.
Plus, I gave plenty of evidence that assimilation has been a goal of our country for immigrants since it's founding. I don't have to prove anything I never claimed.So you don't have any actual evidence to support your assertion.
Thought so.
So you don't have any evidence to support your assertion that immigration policy has always been anti assimilation....thought so.
That's not for entry. That's for the citizenship test. You don't have to take that before we let you in.The Naturalization Test
He did. And Trump's aim has been barring entry, before anyone can even get to setting up the citizenship part.It's a requirement for citizenship.
I never said anything about mere entry.
Sure. Or you can live in a community entirely comprised of rich white people and send your kids to a private school. I suppose assimilation is a little tricky when you think about it. What satisfies?Assimilation has always been the goal.
It's a requirement for citizenship.
I never said anything about mere entry.
Did you mean to write "alt" before the descriptive?Well, you're right about this.
Did you mean to write "alt" before the descriptive?
Meanwhile, our native sons are doing a lot more damage than people we're being told to fear in potential.
What about the Antifa and other radical leftists who don't allow free speech and perpetuate identity politics? Left wing terrorists are the greater threat to this nationI meant that the rules for naturalization are different than the rules for immigration. For a very long time, we didn't have any rules for immigration.
Yes. Right wing terrorists remain a greater threat than Islamic terrorists in this country.
Add this assertion to list:What about the Antifa and other radical leftists who don't allow free speech and perpetuate identity politics? Left wing terrorists are the greater threat to this nation
The Quiet ManGreat John Wayne film with O'Hara as his costar. It's about an American who was born in Ireland but grew up in the states, became a great heavyweight fighter, then accidentally killed a man in the ring. He flees to Ireland to find peace and purchases his family home, setting off all sorts of interesting conflicts. Despite the description it's lighter than that and a very enjoyable film.
At one point an Irish woman gives Wayne's character a stick "To beat the lovely lady with" in line with the rule of thumb. Our Western traditions once treated women like property. They were denied higher education, property rights, could be forceably taken by their husbands and even beaten, within bounds. Women waited until 1920 to vote here.
What's interesting about that to me is how the fight works on a few levels. It's not the outcome of the fight but the fact of it. Wayne's character needs to get past his fear of harming someone and the guilt that came with it, and his new bride finds confirmation of his heart in it and uses it to address her feelings of shame and the way she's bound to a few traditions that have only given her misery. Even the brother gains respect from it, both from the woman he loves and for the man he's inclined to spite.One other note on The Quiet Man. How is the "problem" ultimately fixed? A fist fight.
With Houston there wouldn't be any other way. Wayne too. Violence was metaphor. Curious film.That is the solution in a lot of films. That's great in the movies but a number of generations of TV/film watchers think that is the best solution in life. Think some of that is catching up with us.
What's interesting about that to me is how the fight works on a few levels. It's not the outcome of the fight but the fact of it. Wayne's character needs to get past his fear of harming someone and the guilt that came with it, and his new bride finds confirmation of his heart in it and uses it to address her feelings of shame and the way she's bound to a few traditions that have only given her misery. Even the brother gains respect from it, both from the woman he loves and for the man he's inclined to spite.
With Houston there wouldn't be any other way. Wayne too. Violence was metaphor. Curious film.
I loved the clergy in this. Bond, who managed to be in everything from The Searchers, to It's a Wonderful Life, to The Maltese Falcon, has a really charming role in it. But then, just that's true for just about every character in it.
Why not focus on what's best for America's workers and it's citizens? Why not try to preserve an existing American culture?Give me your tired, poor, huddled masses
What America immigration policy should be focusing on is attracting young families with children.
While the parents may never be proficient in English, history has shown that its the children who make substantial contributions to the country.
While there are always exceptions, young families are motivated to succeed in their new country!
Why not focus on what's best for America's workers and it's citizens? Why not try to preserve an existing American culture?
Where has it ever been tried to artificially preserve a culture at one point in time?