turbosixx
New member
Don't hold back there. I'm sure there's more grime you could scrape from the bottom of that barrel :sheep:
Where should the line be drawn? Who determines where it's drawn?
Don't hold back there. I'm sure there's more grime you could scrape from the bottom of that barrel :sheep:
The purpose and intent of a leg doesn't change if it is blown off.
Just as intent and purpose of marriage and the womb doesn't change if it doesn't work.
Where should the line be drawn? Who determines where it's drawn?
The law might be a good starting point.
The law determines what is good and acceptable now?
Then why change the law when the law outlawed homosexuality?
Why is it fine now but not then, if the law defined morality?
The law determines what is good and acceptable now?
Then why change the law when the law outlawed homosexuality?
Why is it fine now but not then, if the law defined morality?
If I said that the intent of gay couples is to support the families of relations without the distraction of their own, would that help?
Who are you to decide what is 'intended' by the existence of homosexuals?
Sure, lets bring back slavery and using young children to clean chimneys. :kookoo:
Or maybe not, eh?
God is who decided, dont like it? Take it up with Him.
Mutability.
Because the people collectively define the law and morality.
No, the supreme court did not follow the will of the people, they overrode all the states that defined the law and morality for them.
They spoke for the law of the land...the US Constitution. If you don't like it....take it up with them.
Hey be ok with them taking it on themselves to create law when they werent elected, one day its going to bite you.
Reduced to butthurt rhetoric?
At least you admit your flawed stance, just because something is a law, it doesnt make it right or good, congrats on learning that.
I'm not hurt at all. Wishful thinking?
God is who decided, dont like it? Take it up with Him.
Don't you think we would find a way to defy it's natural effect....wait, we did! :idea:
Evidence?You don't know what god intended. You have a book written by people in a language you can't read.
The dead sea scrolls prove that false alone.You have a repeatedly reinterpreted text of recollections and oral history passed down over the years.
I don't think that the Bible even has much to say about modern living law avoiding gay couples living in peace, even if you do believe that it is true. You need to heavily reinterpret a text that meant something specific a long time ago about a specific time and place.
The law might be a good starting point.