You are like a little kid catching a grownup making a simple, mundane mistake
You are confused. I AM the grownup who keeps catching another *supposed* grownup who acts like a child when confronted with her errors.
You are like a little kid catching a grownup making a simple, mundane mistake
And I will just take note of your continued desperation ... :chuckle:
You wouldn't know until AFTER they exposed others ...
That wasn't the argument. Any parent and child could argue that they should not be forced to wear or be prohibited from wearing something. The school does not need to make special rules based on the baseless whims of parents.
"Schools enjoy substantial discretion in adopting policies relating to student dress and school uniforms. Students generally have no Federal right to be exempted from religiously-neutral and generally applicable school dress rules based on their religious beliefs or practices; however, schools may not single out religious attire in general, or attire of a particular religion, for prohibition or regulation. Students may display religious messages on items of clothing to the same extent that they are permitted to display other comparable messages. Religious messages may not be singled out for suppression, but rather are subject to the same rules as generally apply to comparable messages."
The fact is you do not care whether or not the non-vax children are a health risks to others.
You are confused. I AM the grownup who keeps catching another *supposed* grownup who acts like a child when confronted with her errors.
And our lives are better for it.Says the man who owns and rides horses and puts his daughters on them.
No, you don't put my kids at risk as they have been vaccinated against a disease that your kids might have. Remember that 4 day period where your kids are asymptomatic yet highly contagious? By the time you figure out your kids are sick, too late. They have potentially already spread it around some.And I don't put your kids at risk. Your kids would never see mine in town spreading communicable diseases. Yours may or may not be killed by a horse.
And our lives are better for it.
No, you don't put my kids at risk as they have been vaccinated against a disease that your kids might have. Remember that 4 day period where your kids are asymptomatic yet highly contagious? By the time you figure out your kids are sick, too late. They have potentially already spread it around some.
That asymptomatic period is a time when you should already know if they've been exposed to a sick person. You don't wait for symptoms. Anything you don't want to spread, treat it like Ebola.
You are the "grownup" who acts like a little kid when you see a doctor make a mistake. Whoopee.
Research shows doctors are regular grownups like you and make plenty of mistakes all the time. Would you like me to rub your nose in it or will you concede?
If you define desperation as a synonym for fun. :devil:
Not if I was warned of measles outbreak and possible exposure to a sick child. You treat anything you don't want to spread like Ebola. Problem solved. Don't wait for symptoms.
We're not talking baseless.
Bad example. Religious clothing requirements are respected.
You are a bigoted Fascist who hates Libertarian principles from what I can gather. If you want to call opinion of others "fact" then that's mine.
You cannot say we don't care.
We didn't let our kids play with the neighbors when they were sick.
But a neighbor kid who goes to public school was all over the place, even at school while contagious. That's not right, vaccinated or not. That's not thoughtful at all.
Concede what?
Public schools. Where other parents also send *their* children. School districts follow policies for a reason. You don't have to agree. IF one doesn't wish to comply, they do not have to utilize the public school.
me said:School districts who institute policies that force parents to knowingly endanger their children are fascist and illegitimate.
While the OTHER parents who abide by the rules are having their own children put at risk by these non vaccinated children thanks to the parents. You do understand that parents do not get to decide what risk they are allowed to put other children under, right?
me said:Non vaccinated children do not put vaccinated children at any greater risk to disease than in a fully vaccinated school. You forget the failure of some vaccinations and older children and adults who lose immunity.
There was no force. The child did NOT receive the vaccination. The author of this thread does not like the fact the school district is requiring vaccinations in order to attend.
me said:There is always force involved if the threat of removal of a legitimate right is given if rules are not followed.
The parents are making the decision to not have their child attend. To play it off as anything else is a farce.
me said:The parents are making the decision to not have their child vaccinated. To play off the subsequent removal from school as anything other than fascism is a farce.
The parents are making the decision to not have their child vaccinated.
Indeed. I have no problem whatsoever with those parents teaching their children from home.
During an outbreak in my area, I'd be on the lookout for potential exposure. It should be a civic duty to keep away from people or warn them if they may have been exposed.Should being the key word there. The fact is, you have no idea if you have been exposed in the first place nor to what you were exposed to in the second place.
Since they all kill, they should all be treated the same. Fever is your sign to stay home!You may be exposed by somebody in their own asymptomatic stage so you have no idea that you were exposed. Once you have symptoms, what are they symptoms of? Measles? Common cold? Flu?
Your model to prevent your kids spreading something only works if you maintain constant isolation.
Indeed. I have no problem whatsoever with those parents teaching their children from home.
The parents are making the decision to not have their child attend. To play it off as anything else is a farce.
The key here is how long it takes to determine an outbreak of a specific disease has occurred. By the time an outbreak has been declared, it may be to late for you to self quarantine, your children have long since been exposed.During an outbreak in my area, I'd be on the lookout for potential exposure. It should be a civic duty to keep away from people or warn them if they may have been exposed.
Actually, its not. My daughters get some pretty sever sprint time allergies characterized by runny noses, red, itchy, puffy eyes and a fever. We have taken them to the doctor so we know that it is allergies causing the fever, usually due to dehydration. There is no reason to keep them home for that fever or other symptoms. They want to go to school so we let them.Since they all kill, they should all be treated the same. Fever is your sign to stay home!
Then you foolishly do not understand spread of disease. Each and every day and any place you go, your chances of being exposed to something is significant. It can range from a minor cold to a viral infection that ends up destroying your heart (this actually happened to my cousin). The only way. the only way, for you avoid that exposure is to to become completely self sufficient and never expose your family to the non-crunchy world.Hardly. But it may work better in rural or suburban communities. :idunno:
Actually this is a global culture war and in some places children are snatched or parents put into prison.
Then why would you support Cali law which is being molded into all-students must be vaccinated,