The law WITH ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS are no more as for being a command to still do. God nailed them to the cross.
No, he didn't "nail them to the cross," you satanic clown.
The law WITH ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS are no more as for being a command to still do. God nailed them to the cross.
John 2:22
After He was raised from the dead, His disciples remembered that He had said this. Then they believed the Scripture and the word that Jesus had spoken.
Catch that drunken stupor assertion? We can read what sin is by reading the law, but the law was nailed to the cross, as it does not exist anymore, according to this moron, child of the devil.
You're a demon possessed, lush, clown.
Colossians 2:14 13When you were dead in your trespasses and in the uncircumcision of your sinful flesh, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave us all our trespasses, 14having canceled the debt ascribed to us in the decrees that stood against us. He took it away, nailing it to the cross! 15And having disarmed the rulers and authorities, He made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them by the cross.16Therefore let no one judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a festival, a New Moon, or a Sabbath.
Did you read that? That is about the purification/ceremonial works being nailed to the cross. We don't have to get circumcised, and adhere to a dietary law, and observe special days, etc.
Ephesians 2:15
by abolishing in His flesh the law of commandments and decrees. He did this to create in Himself one new man out of the two, thus making peace
No scripture says he nailed the law to the cross, as you've been shown, you admitted demon posessed clown, pawn of Satan, as TOL laughs at your biblical ineptness.
You can't handle it can you?
You were shown the truth and now all you can do is speak obscene things.
No scripture says he nailed the law to the cross, as you've been shown, you admitted demon possessed clown, pawn of Satan, as TOL laughs at your biblical ineptness.
No scripture says he nailed the law to the cross, as you've been shown, you admitted demon posessed clown, pawn of Satan, as TOL laughs at your biblical ineptness.
Colossians 2:13 When you were dead in your trespasses and in the uncircumcision of your sinful flesh, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave us all our trespasses, 14having canceled the debt ascribed to us in the decrees that stood against us. He took it away, nailing it to the cross! 15And having disarmed the rulers and authorities, He made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them by the cross.16Therefore let no one judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a festival, a New Moon, or a Sabbath.
Did you read that? That is about the purification/ceremonial works being nailed to the cross. We don't have to get circumcised, and adhere to a dietary law, and observe special days, etc.
Ephesians 2:15
by abolishing in His flesh the law of commandments and decrees. He did this to create in Himself one new man out of the two, thus making peace
HE ABOLISHED it in his flesh.
"the handwriting of ordinances" and "the law of commandments contained in ordinances" is not the law of Moses, God's holy law, as you've been shown, you demon possessed clown.
If the rich young ruler was a coveter, then the Lord's advice to him didn't create a new commandment for everybody, or reinterpret the law; He revealed the rich young ruler's sin of coveting to him, and to us. He was showing the rich young ruler just what Paul would later say in Galatians 3:22 KJV, "the scripture hath concluded all under sin." The rich young ruler was blind to his covetousness, but the Lord saw it clearly, and ingeniously communicated it to both him and to His future Apostles and even to us through the publishing and preservation of the four Gospels.
2.The rich man didn't sin by coveting.
Under the Torah the rich young ruler would not live forever because he was a coveter. That's one of the Ten. The Lord taught Exodus 20:17 KJV can apply to treasure that is already yours, not just that belongs to someone else. Luke 12:15 KJV, "...things which he possesseth."The rich man didn't sin by coveting.
Coveting is as bad as adultery.He followed the law of Moses and told others to do the same because that is the law they lived under. Jesus did not teach the law of Moses, he taught his law and about the kingdom.
27(Law of Moses) “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ 28 (Christ's law) But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
When did the law of Moses end?
No, GT is right. Peter knew all about the DBR being the means of salvation for all.
That's why he tried to stop Christ going to the cross.
Because Peter knew it was the means of salvation for all.
So he tried to stop it.
Yep. God's ultimate good news for the world, so Peter tried to prevent it happening.
That Peter, what a card.
The purification/ceremonial works were indeed part of the whole law as given to Moses from God, and they were nailed to the cross. He abolished it in his flesh.
No, the law was not nailed to the cross, you child of the devil-"the handwriting of ordinances" and "the law of commandments contained in ordinances" is not the law of Moses, God's holy law, as you've been shown, you demon possessed clown.
Your analogies aren't from God.
Jesus is not divided. He is not going to give two opposing gospels.
So why did God decree that putting to death murderers was not allowed after Cain killed Abel, but then made murder worthy of death later?
Was not God doing two different things at two different times?
You make it sound like God can only do one thing, and one thing only, and never change his plans.
Talk about putting God in a box...
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
You are the one doing that.
God doesn't have two different GOSPELS THAT SAVE.
So you're saying God couldn't do two different things at two different times with two different groups of people?You are the one doing that.
God doesn't have two different GOSPELS THAT SAVE.
So you're saying God couldn't do two different things at two different times with two different groups of people?
Yes or no?
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk