Yep. Too little, too late.As much as I love to see this, where was Mo Brooks when it came time to impeach Trump? He voted no.
Yep. Too little, too late.As much as I love to see this, where was Mo Brooks when it came time to impeach Trump? He voted no.
Yep, Trump gave us Federalist Society-approved Republican Supreme Court Justices, and we know from Bob Enyart that "Abortion Nationally is from the Republican Supreme Court". Trump's Supreme Court also voted in favor of vaccine mandates:Three Republican Supreme Court Justices. BAM!!!!
Yeah. He's awesome like I said. But his time is past and we're looking to the future.Yep, Trump gave us Federalist Society-approved Republican Supreme Court Justices, and we know from Bob Enyart that "Abortion Nationally is from the Republican Supreme Court". Trump's Supreme Court also voted in favor of vaccine mandates:
...
Trump's Supreme Court voted against lawsuits to overturn the 2020 eletion:
...
Trump's Republican Supreme Court Justices voted in favor of mail-in voting:
...
"BAM!!!!" indeed!
Hopefully…This is just the start. I predict that Trump will do whatever he can to burn the Republican house down!
Since the Republican house is largely filled with RINOs, I hope Trump succeeds.I predict that Trump will do whatever he can to burn the Republican house down!
Hillary and the lying democrats have been falsely accusing Trump of crimes he did not commit for years, so it should surprise nobody that Trump-hating leftist prosecutors are resigning after being unable to come up with the evidence for a conviction, while still insisting the evidence is there.Now we know why DA Brag refused to release letters of resignation
A top prosecutor who abruptly left the Manhattan DA's office said in his resignation letter there's 'no doubt' that Trump committed 'numerous' felonies
One of the two top prosecutors who suddenly left the Manhattan district attorney's office last month said in his resignation letter that he believes former President Donald Trump is guilty of "numerous" felonies, The New York Times reported.
"The team that has been investigating Mr. Trump harbors no doubt about whether he committed crimes — he did," the prosecutor, Mark Pomerantz, said in his resignation latter, according to The Times.
Pomerantz and Carey Dunne, the other senior prosecutor who was leading the DA's criminal investigation into the Trump Organization's business dealings, resigned in February after the new district attorney, Alvin Bragg, expressed doubts about moving forward with a case against the former president.
Pomerantz said in his resignation letter, dated February 23, that Trump was in fact "guilty of numerous felony violations" and that it would be a "grave failure of justice" to not hold him accountable for his actions, according to The Times.
Is Mo Brooks a Rino?Since the Republican house is largely filled with RINOs,
Something we can agree on!I hope Trump succeeds.
Good people oppose voter fraud and bad people do what they can to cover up their crimes by falsely accusing good people of being criminals.On Thursday, The Washington Post reported that among the bombshell texts between former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and far-right activist Ginni Thomas was an admission from Meadows that infamous "kraken" lawyer Sidney Powell, one of the key figures trying to overturn the 2020 presidential election, had no evidence to back her claims of fraud.
"By Nov. 22, Trump gave his blessing for Giuliani and another Trump lawyer, Jenna Ellis, to issue a statement claiming that Powell 'is not a member of the Trump Legal Team,'" reported Bob Woodward and Robert Costa. "Thomas reached out to Meadows that day with concern. 'Trying to understand the Sidney Powell distancing,' she wrote. 'She doesn’t have anything or at least she won’t share it if she does,' Meadows texted back. 'Wow!' Thomas replied. Meadows did not respond."
Meadows' dismissal of Powell comes despite the fact that he worked behind the scenes to try to get the Justice Department to investigate conspiracy theories about the election, even a wild claim that Italian satellites were used to hack U.S. voting machines. But he was not alone in dismissing Powell's claims as nonsense.
Mark Meadows admitted to Ginni Thomas that Sidney Powell 'doesn't have anything' on election fraud
On Thursday, The Washington Post reported that among the bombshell texts between former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and far-right activist Ginni Thomas was an admission from Meadows that infamous "kraken" lawyer Sidney Powell, one of the key figures trying to overturn the 2020...www.rawstory.com
I know, right? Trump was wrong to fire Sidney Powell, she was only trying to help! What a backstabber that Trump is.Good people oppose voter fraud and bad people do what they can to cover up their crimes by falsely accusing good people of being criminals.
Maybe you are right but if you are you aren't saying much since you could say that about anyone you want and possibly be right to at least some extent. Your hateful fixation on Trump is not healthy.I know, right? Trump was wrong to fire Sidney Powell, she was only trying to help! What a backstabber that Trump is.
She did nothing wrong. Millions of Americans were discussing how to deal with the stolen election. Only perverted democrats claim discussing the stolen election is a crime.Ginni Thomas Pressed Trump’s Chief of Staff to Overturn 2020 Vote, Texts Show
The messages between Ms. Thomas and Mark Meadows are the first evidence that she directly advised the White House in efforts to reverse the election results.
Those texts... major cringe. The background to Ginni Thomas is enlightening, to say the least.
Leftists and blind democrats are being led around by the nose by leftist democrat liars and crooks claiming opposition to democrat voter fraud amounts to treason.
Supreme Court Justices aren’t bound by the judicial code of conduct that applies to all other federal judges, which mandates that they recuse themselves from participating in any cases in which personal entanglements could cause a fair-minded member of the public to doubt their impartiality. Yet Justices are subject to a federal law that prohibits them from hearing cases in which their spouses have “an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding.” The statute, 28 U.S.C. section 455, also requires them to disqualify themselves from any proceedings in which their “impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”
Justice Thomas has already participated in two cases related to the 2020 election and its aftermath, despite his wife’s direct involvement in the so-called Stop the Steal efforts. A third case, John Eastman v. Bennie Thompson, may soon reach the Court. Eastman, a right-wing legal theorist who advised Trump on ways to challenge the 2020 election results, is arguing that attorney-client privilege shields his records from the congressional committee that is investigating the January 6th insurrection, which is chaired by Thompson, a Democratic member of Congress from Mississippi; the committee argues that this privilege can’t be used to conceal potential crimes by Eastman or Trump. The case, currently in a federal district court in California, is likely to reach the Supreme Court on appeal.
What makes you think I hate Trump? I love the guy. I ought to, since he's given me so many belly laughs these last few years...Your hateful fixation on Trump is not healthy.
Love him or hate him - that is your perogative. Love God or go to hell is also a choice sinners make while on earth.What makes you think I hate Trump? I love the guy. I ought to, since he's given me so many laughs these last few years...
Love him or hate him - that is your perogative. Love God or go to hell is also a choice sinners make while on earth.
Idiotic. What's the non-binary way to think about whether twice two is four? It either is or it isn't.How to Avoid Binary Thinking and Think More Clearly - LifeHack
Binary thinking is everywhere today. You are either for or against something, conservative or liberal, or pro-choice or pro-life. The list goes on, fromwww.lifehack.org
Idiotic. What's the non-binary way to think about whether twice two is four? It either is or it isn't.