You Qanon followers know that Trump will be our president through 2024? "Fantasy Island" indeed! Say hello to Tattoo while you're there, Jefferson.
Last edited:
Fiona Hill: "The president was trying to stage a coup"
- Thread starter annabenedetti
- Start date
You Qanon followers know that Trump will be our president through 2024? "Fantasy Island" indeed! Say hello to Tattoo while you're there, Jefferson.
Oh my, someone made a claim! I guess that settles it!
Someone, but not just anyone. The "someone" in this case is Jason Van Tatenhove, the former spokesman for the Oath Keepers.
Who?
All like...20 of them.
If you think that only 20 people invaded the Capitol, then....All like...20 of them.
"Who?" indeed. If I were you, I'd be feigning ignorance of these people as well--out of sheer embarrassment if for no other reason.
If you think that only 20 people invaded the Capitol, then....
Yeah, that's right; they were all involved in a grand armed revolution...The granny I posted earlier is actually a West Point Trained, Retired Full-Bird just itching to get back in the one last time.I was being kind when I gave you the credit that maybe that's what the Oath Keepers thought they were up to...I mean, they never struck me as an overly- intelligent group. Maybe they thought an "armed revolution" could be accomplished by their goofy little stack formation, that something would be changed besides just being a footnote in history about...What? The domestic terrorist hostage crisis? Stolen computers?
I don't know...
All I know is that you could have took the ball and stumbled on about how there are alot more Oath Keepers than that (Not that it's enough to matter). But no, not you...Yeah...Okay...It was an armed revolution.
It was just like the 1917 Winter Palace!...No!, wait!...The storming of the Bastille?More Contemporary!
Iranian Revolution!....It was just like that!...Complete with religious zealots (Only they just had nice Muslims, rather than those horrible Christians)
I'm sure it was mostly peaceful.
Give me a break already!
And I have people whimpering at me about why I don't want to "discuss" anything any more....Give me a discussion worth having.
I've heard their name come up several times but only from liberal sources. I don't recall Q ever mentioning them.
Oh sure, there is no question that these people overestimated and overextended themselves big time. That's Trump's default mode of operation!
I don't recall Q ever being right about anything that really mattered, ever.
Democrats stole the 2020 election and then proceeded to accuse opponents of voter fraud of treason. How stupid and dishonest is that?
Biden got 255,000 ‘excess’ votes in fraud-tainted swing states in 2020, study finds
President Biden received hundreds of thousands of “excess” votes in Democratic-controlled areas in the 2020 election, according to an academic study on voter fraud that suggests the push to relax voting standards created new opportunities for electoral mischief.
President Biden received hundreds of thousands of “excess” votes in Democratic-controlled areas in the 2020 election, according to an academic study on voter fraud that suggests the push to relax voting standards created new opportunities for electoral mischief.
John R. Lott Jr., the man behind the research, teased out those numbers by comparing Democratic-dominant areas to Republican-dominant places over the past two presidential elections, particularly in places where claims of election fraud were reported in 2020.
Looking at six swing states, the data he crunched found that voter turnout in Republican areas increased from 2016 to 2020 while voter turnout among Democrats dropped — except in places where voter fraud was claimed.
That accounted for 255,000 “excess” votes for Mr. Biden above what would be expected, Mr. Lott said. His paper has been accepted for publication in Public Choice, a peer-reviewed journal specializing in the intersection of economics and political science.
“More heavily Democratic counties actually had a slightly lower turnout in 2020, except for counties where vote fraud was alleged. In those counties, you had a huge increase in turnout,” Mr. Lott told The Washington Times in an interview explaining his findings.
You're saying you think the Oath Keepers mattered? I sure never did.
Instead of trying to convince Americans that democrats did not commit election fraud in 2020, the leftists could openly support changes in voting laws to limit even the possibility of fraud in the future.
++++++++++++++++++
9 Election Reforms States Can Implement to Prevent Mistakes, Vote Fraud (dailysignal.com)
9 Election Reforms States Can Implement to Prevent Mistakes and Voter Fraud
Hans von Spakovsky / @HvonSpakovsky / February 02, 2021
All voters nationwide should be required to validate his or her identity with a government-issued photo ID to vote in person or by absentee ballot.
COMMENTARY BY
Hans von Spakovsky@HvonSpakovsky
Hans von Spakovsky is a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, a former commissioner on the Federal Election Commission, and former counsel to the assistant attorney general for civil rights at the U.S. Department of Justice. He is a member of the board of the Public Interest Legal Foundation.
Election fraud is real.
The Heritage Foundation’s Election Fraud Database, which has chronicled more than 1,300 cases of election fraud, proves that election fraud does occur in American elections.
Errors and omissions by election officials and careless, shoddy election practices and procedures or lack of training can also cause and have caused problems for voters and candidates alike.
But it doesn’t have to be this way. States can, and should, take action to restore integrity to our elections.
Want to keep up with the 24/7 news cycle? Want to know the most important stories of the day for conservatives? Need news you can trust? Subscribe to The Daily Signal’s email newsletter. Learn more >>
Here’s a list of best practices states should adopt for elections.
1. Verify the accuracy of voter registration lists. Computerized statewide voter registration lists should be designed to be interoperable so that they can communicate seamlessly with other state record databases to allow frequent exchanges and comparisons of information.
For example, when an individual changes the residence address on his or her driver’s license, that information should be sent to state election officials so that the voter registration address of the individual is also changed to his or her new Department of Motor Vehicles residence address.
2. Verify citizenship of voters. Only lawful citizens can vote in federal elections. States should, therefore, require proof of citizenship to register to vote, as well as verify the citizenship of registered voters with the records of the Department of Homeland Security, including access to the E-Verify system.
3. Require voter ID. A voter should be required to validate his or her identity with government-issued photo ID to vote in-person or by absentee ballot (as states such as Alabama and Kansas require). Government-issued IDs should be free for those who cannot afford one.
4. Limit absentee ballots. Absentee ballots should be reserved for those individuals who are too disabled to vote in person or who will be out of town on Election Day and all early-voting days.
5. Prevent vote trafficking. Vote trafficking (also called “vote harvesting”) by third parties should be banned. That would ensure that candidates, campaign staffers, party activists, and political consultants are prohibited from picking up and potentially mishandling or changing absentee ballots and pressuring or coercing vulnerable voters in their homes.
In other words, a political group can’t offer to pick up ballots and then bring them to the polling place and/or mail them, with no third party supervising that group’s behavior in the interim.
6. Allow election observers complete access to the election process. Political parties, candidates, and third-party organizations should all be allowed to have observers in every aspect of the election process, because transparency is essential to a fair and secure system. The only limitation on such observers is that they cannot interfere with the voting and counting process.
However, a representative of the election office should be present to answer the questions of the observers. They should be legally allowed to be in a position—exactly like election officials—to observe everything going on, other than the actual voting by individuals.
Election officials should be prohibited from stationing observers so far away that they cannot observe the process, including such procedures as the opening of absentee ballots and the verification process.
7. Provide voting assistance. Any individuals providing assistance to a voter in a voting booth because the voter is illiterate, disabled, or otherwise requires assistance should be required to complete a form, to be filed with poll election officials, providing their name, address, contact information, and the reason they are providing assistance. They should also be required to provide a photo ID.
8. Prohibit early vote counting. To avoid premature release of election results, the counting of ballots, including absentee and early votes, should not begin until the polls close at the end of Election Day. However, if a state insists on beginning the count before Election Day, it should ban the release of results until the evening of Election Day, subject to criminal penalties.
9. Provide state legislatures with legal standing. State legislatures must ensure that they have legal standing—either through a specific state law or through a constitutional amendment, if that is required—to sue other state officials, such as governors or secretaries of state, who make or attempt to make unauthorized changes in state election laws.
For example, if a secretary of state extends the deadline set by state law for the receipt of absentee ballots, legislatures should have legal standing to contest that unilateral change that overrides state law. They should be classified as a necessary party in any lawsuit.
And voters should be provided by state law with the ability to file a writ of mandamus against any state or local official who fails to abide by, or enforce, a state election law requirement.
In 2020, Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar made changes to election law unilaterally. We need to ensure that can’t happen again in other states or in future elections.
Along with these nine (and other) reforms, there are specific measures states shouldn’t take.
For instance, there should be no same-day registration for voting. Registration should be required before Election Day to give election officials sufficient time to verify the accuracy of the registration information contained on a registration form and to confirm the eligibility of the potential voter.
There also shouldn’t be automatic voter registration. States should comply with the National Voter Registration Act and provide registration opportunities at state agencies. However, all individuals should be asked at the time of the state agency transaction, such as the application for a driver’s license, whether they want to register to vote.
No one should be automatically registered without their consent or knowledge, since this can lead to multiple registrations by the same individual, as well as the registration of ineligible individuals, such as noncitizens.
As we all know, elections have consequences. That’s why it’s crucial to ensure that every vote counts and isn’t diluted by election fraud and other problems. It’s time for states to implement these reforms to ensure voters will have faith in our elections.
Are the democrats twisting another series of statements for the purpose of convincing rubes that republicans were planning to overthrow the most transparent, honest, intelligent, trustworthy socialist democrat administration in US history?
Racist democrats want Justice Thomas impeached because he is not supportive of immoral socialist atheist causes.
If you think that only 20 people invaded the Capitol, then....
Thousands of peaceful protesters were infiltrated on Jan 6 by agitators of violence, many of whom were leftists pretending to be Trump supporters and even agents working for the US government. Go figure.
Former Federal ‘Informant’ Warned of Antifa, BLM Infiltrators at Capitol on Jan. 6 (theepochtimes.com)
Former Federal ‘Informant’ Warned of Antifa, BLM Infiltrators at Capitol on Jan. 6
Law enforcement aware large crowds would be travelling to Capitol from the Ellipse, documents show
By Joseph M. Hanneman
July 8, 2022 Updated: July 8, 2022
The man whose posting on social media warned authorities that agent provocateurs from Antifa and Black Lives Matter would be at the U.S. Capitol dressed as Trump supporters on Jan. 6, 2021, is a self-described government informant tied to former deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein.
Rosenstein warned about a “soft coup” against then-President Donald Trump in fall 2020.
On Jan. 4, 2021, an account under the name @JohnHereToHelp posted on Twitter that Antifa and BLM agitators were being bussed from Baltimore to Washington to cause trouble at the Capitol on the day of Trump’s speech …