So no reply but instead a red herring. I guess another thread goes no where. He is outside the faith and trying to pull people from it. It is obvious.
		
		
	 
Here is a link to a professor speaking to Wescott and Hort's occult beliefs.
Here is a quote from the following link.
	
	
		
			
			
				
				Westcott and Hort: Translator's Beliefs
				
					
						
					
					www.jesusisprecious.org
				
			 
		 
	 
OCCULT INVOLVEMENT
Westcott and Hort founded several occult societies, two of which were “The Hermes Club” and “The Ghostly Guild.” These were not merely college projects. They were created at one of the highest learning institutions, in the world's largest imperial world-power at that time, Great Britain. Members of these clubs (and the occult associations which they went on to found, such as “
The Society for Psychical Research” in  1882), started the Luciferian modern New Age Movement. They also became  prominent members of British Royalty and politics, as well as occupied the  highest positions in the Anglican Church (including that which is equivalent  to that of the Pope in the Roman Catholic Church, the Archbishop of  Canterbury). To say that Westcott and Hort were well connected is an  understatement. The latter 19th century was a time of massive occult  infiltration into nearly every major organization.
 
The excellent book, “New Age Bible Versions” by Dr. Gail Riplinger has this to  say about Westcott and Hort:
   
B.F. Westcott is identified as “a  mystic” by the standard reference work of his day: The Encyclopedia Britannica  (1911). Princeton University Press' book, The Christian Socialist Revival  (1968, Peter Da Jones) says B.F. Westcott was “a mystic” (page 179). The  highly respected “Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics” identifies both B.F.  Westcott and F.J.A. Hort as Alexandrian mystics (see 'Alexandrian Theology' et  al.). The “Occult Illustrated Dictionary” makes reference to B.F. Westcott,  Hort, and Lightfoot and their 'ghostly' games. 
 
NEW AGE BIBLE VERSIONS (1:23 hour MP3 interview with            
Dr. Gail            Riplinger). You need to hear this, because Satan is creeping  into our churches through the corrupted modern Bible versions.
 
In  
  a letter to his wife (dated October 23, 1864) Hort wrote (then age 36):
   
“We had a pleasant evening, six  of Westcott's Sixth Form boys dining with us .... Then we worked till near  dinner, when we had a very nice little party, the two De Morgans, H. M.  Butler, Farrar, Brady and his mother, and H. W. Watson. Mrs. Brady ... came in  the evening. We tried to turn tables, but the creatures wouldn't stir. Both  the De Morgans were radiant and pleasant.”
 
The phrase “we tried to turn tables” is a direct reference to an occult séance  and “the creatures” that “wouldn't stir” is a clear reference to the spirits  that Hort and his guests were invoking to establish communication with.  Westcott and Hort were accomplished practitioners of the occult. The sometimes  promoted idea that these occult activities were only a part of Hort's younger  days, is refuted by numerous quotes in the book, 
New Age Bible Versions.  For example: Dr. Riplinger states:
   
“He speaks, as late as 1880 (age 55), about 'fellowship with the spiritual  world'” and “the dominion which the dead have over us”  (New Age Bible Versions, by Dr. Gail Riplinger; page 439). 
 
Heretics Westcott and Hort were secretly working on their revised 1881 New  Testament Greek text since as early as 1853-1857:
   
  “The principle literary work of these years was the revision of the Greek Text  of the New Testament. All spare hours were devoted to it.”  (Life, Volume I, page 399; October 21, 1858 - Fenton Hort)
 
Clearly, Westcott and Hort were Occult practitioners during the time that they  were revising the Greek Text of the New Testament. Their Master Greek text of  1881 has become the benchmark of the modern corrupt translations today with  most people completely unaware of the historical occult connection. Please  read, 
Occult Roots Of The Modern  Bible Versions.
 
THEIR BELIEFS
 
Westcott and Hort believed the Greek text which underlies the KJV was perverse  and corrupt. Hort called the Textus Receptus “vile and villainous” (Life and  Letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort, Volume I, page 211). Since Westcott and Hort are the fathers of modern textual criticism and the  restorers of the true text,  we need to know something of their beliefs to  see if they are consistent with Holy Scripture.  This would be harmonious with the teaching found in Matthew 7:17.
 
Here's what Westcott and Hort said about their beliefs...
 
The Scriptures:
   
	
	
		
		
			
“All I hold is, that the more I  learn, the more I am convinced that fresh doubts come from my own ignorance,  and that at present I find the presumption in favour of the absolute truth I  reject the word infallibility of Holy Scripture over whelming. Of course I  feel difficulties which at present I cannot solve, and which I never hope to  solve. ” (Westcott,  The Life and Letters of Brook Foss Westcott, Vol. I, p.207). 
 
  
While verifying the preceding quote, I found a  website at westcotthort.com today.  The information is invaluable and I appreciate the author's labors. Albeit,  the author of the preceding hyperlink attempts to defend Mr. Westcott,  claiming that he is merely rejecting the “word” infallibility and not the Holy  Scriptures themselves. I disagree strongly. How can Dr. Westcott reject the  word “infallibility” concerning the Holy Scriptures, and not reject the  perfection of the Scriptures themselves? Obviously, that is not possible. I  see that the author of westcotthort.com means well, but there is no honest way  you can defend a heretic like Brooke Westcott. There's just no way! Westcott  denied a literal Heaven, a literal Hell, and he openly states in his writings  that the Romanish (Catholic) view came closer to the truth than the  Evangelical (Christian) view. Read the ugly truth for yourself in the  remaining quotes on this webpage. 
  
In the “About”  section of the westcotthort.com website, the author states his website's  intention: “I thought it would be a great idea to share it - to make the  hard-to-find books available in general, to help others in their  investigation/refutation of KJV-onlyism.” Clearly, the author is biased  against the exclusivity of the King James Bible. Yet, when we consider which  Bible today upholds the Godhead, deity of Jesus, preeminence of Christ, and a  correct view of what it means to “repent,” only the precious inspired  and preserved King James Bible stands the test. Yes, I am King James  ONLY!!!!!!! 
  
The writer is correct that some websites have  perverted Westcott's original words, which I am diligently trying to avoid.  The truth is so very important. It is sinful to misquote anybody in an attempt  to win one's own personal argument, whether their argument is right or wrong.  Westcott's and Hort's writings are public domain, freely available for anyone  to read online. I went directly to the source of the following quote (same as  the earlier quote), to ensure its accuracy. You can read it for yourself on  page 207 of the book titled,    The Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott. The following quote was  written by Brooke Westcott in May of 1860: 
 
  
“All I hold is, that the more        I learn, the more I am convinced that fresh doubts come from my own        ignorance, and that at present I find the presumption in favour of the        absolute truth I reject the word infallibility of Holy Scripture over        whelming. Of course I feel difficulties which at present I cannot solve,        and which I never hope to solve. ” (Westcott,  The Life and Letters of Brook Foss Westcott, Vol. I, p.207.) 
     |