No, old fool; Bullinger was Acts 28. My view is Acts 9, more or less.
Should I show your quote where you say you're aren't Mid-Acts?
No, old fool; Bullinger was Acts 28. My view is Acts 9, more or less.
It doesn't matter what Bible you use, the Gentiles became fellow heirs with the promises to Israel.
Should I show your quote where you say you're aren't Mid-Acts?
It doesn't matter what Bible you use, the Gentiles became fellow heirs with the promises to Israel.
Who was the Messiah promised to?
There is no mystery in Mid-Acts.
You guys can't even show anyone were in Mid-Acts this alleged mystery is. That's why some of you are Acts 7, some are Acts 9, and some are Acts 13.
Nope, it's the Darby followers who are spiritually blind.
Yet you claim God still has a plan for a fleshly people.
I'm not. Not really.
No one in Mid-Acts is.
Who was the Messiah promised to?
There is no mystery in Mid-Acts.
You guys can't even show anyone were in Mid-Acts this alleged mystery is. That's why some of you are Acts 7, some are Acts 9, and some are Acts 13.
Nope, it's the Darby followers who are spiritually blind.
Yet you claim God still has a plan for a fleshly people.
It comes from this verse:That right there might make for an interesting thread - what does "spiritually discerned" actually refer to; how does it work; etc.
1 Corinthians 2:14 14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. |
Teaching the Holy Bible dispensationally actually makes it more difficult to understand the Holy Bible, since it introduces many errors in thinking that hide the simple truths that are found by simply looking at the Bible covenants.First, one must teach the Holy Bible dispensationally to understand it.
You completely missed my point in my use of the word mystery there.
And you and other Preterists disagree on the NIV's reliability.
You hold the view that the 2nd Coming already happened.
Others who also assert they hold to Partial Preterism disagree with you on that. Interplanner says it is yet future.
And learn the gospel of the grace of God; believe it; get out there and preach it to the lost.
See if God does not have a plan for fleshly people.
See if God does not have a plan for fleshly people.
These don't contradict anything to do with what I wrote. If you want to say something, just come out and say it. I'm not going to be able to read your mind to figure out how you interpret verses.2 Timothy 3:16
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
Ezekiel 33:11
Say unto them, As I live, saith the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?
Let Israel be as Ephraim and Manasseh.
Sands of the sea.
Teaching the Holy Bible dispensationally actually makes it more difficult to understand the Holy Bible, since it introduces many errors in thinking that hide the simple truths that are found by simply looking at the Bible covenants.
These don't contradict anything to do with what I wrote. If you want to say something, just come out and say it. I'm not going to be able to read your mind to figure out how you interpret verses.
Jarrod
You think God has a separate plan for a certain fleshly people (Jews).
Quit trying to be deceitful.
Her I understood.Nang got it.
Not sure what else I can say.
Her I understood.
Are you also trying to retain the Levitical priesthood, and the ordinances of the law that were nailed to the cross? If so, why?
Jarrod
You think God has a separate plan for a certain fleshly people (Jews).
Quit trying to be deceitful.