Do you protest having intercourse with women on their period?

Status
Not open for further replies.

serpentdove

BANNED
Banned
It is a private matter and extremely unseemly as a thread topic!

I get out there and
emoticones_gestos_cruzando-los-dedos2_en.PlanetaEmoticon.com.gif
protest :freak: every week regarding this issue. :hammer:
 

GuySmiley

Well-known member
Do you honestly think that there are more gay sexual acts a year than husbands who engage in similar activity with their wives while on their "time of the month"?

Come on now. Gays are less than 10% of the population. That's ridiculous
Who knows? But either way, we aren't being asked to accept SWMW and its not being taught to our children in school. Its never really spoken about. If gays would just shut up about how they like to have sex, it wouldn't be front page news either.
 

So many gays!

BANNED
Banned
:dizzy: Too bad you don't know your bible.

"Too bad." :chz4brnz: ~ Seth Brundle, The Fly

"Le 18:19 Her customary impurity refers to a woman’s menstrual period. Sexual intercourse during this time was forbidden because the woman was ritually impure, and intercourse would make the man ritually impure as well." Radmacher, E. D., Allen, R. B., & House, H. W. (1999). Nelson’s new illustrated Bible commentary (Le 18:19). Nashville: T. Nelson Publishers.

Recommended reading:

The Plot by Bob Enyart

Remind me, how many years did Enyart spend studying the very thing that my religious scholars have been studying?

0? I thought so. Thanks for your comment anyway
 

So many gays!

BANNED
Banned
Who knows? But either way, we aren't being asked to accept SWMW and its not being taught to our children in school. Its never really spoken about. If gays would just shut up about how they like to have sex, it wouldn't be front page news either.

Are you serious? The ONLY reason it's in the news is because people like you and Kim oppose it at every turn. Do you think that Kim would've made the headlines if she'd have simply complied? Of course not
 

serpentdove

BANNED
Banned
Lot committed incest and then blamed his daughters.

The daughters got him drunk (Ge 19:32).

"Ge 19:31–36 The immoral philosophy of Sodom and Gomorrah had so corrupted the thinking of Lot’s daughters that they unhesitatingly contrived to be impregnated by their own father! They were virgins (v. 8), the married daughters were dead (v. 14) and there were no men left for husbands (v. 25). In fearing they would have no children, they conceived the gross iniquity." MacArthur, J., Jr. (Ed.). (1997). The MacArthur Study Bible (electronic ed., p. 42). Nashville, TN: Word Pub.

"The Peas" ~ PornOReilly
old_man-3569.gif
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Personally? I believe newbies need a chance to learn the ropes around here. So I will try verbal warnings and reminders of where the lines are drawn.
We want new people to feel comfortable here... Of course, we want to
feel comfortable too. A little give and take is nice for a beginning.

First::singer: Then: :angrymob:

he's not a noob
 

Zeke

Well-known member
No. And I'll tell you why: animals tend to shy away from reproducing with those that are closely related due to increased chances of genetic disease. Therefore, it is natural for father and daughter, mother and son, brother and sister, and so on to NOT engage in that type of behavior. It hurts the genetic line

If one is referencing the world of corruptible genetics that is. The animals and Noah's family (if one takes scripture as literal history) on the ark would have degenerated over a few generations.
 

So many gays!

BANNED
Banned
The daughters got him drunk (Ge 19:32).

"Ge 19:31–36 The immoral philosophy of Sodom and Gomorrah had so corrupted the thinking of Lot’s daughters that they unhesitatingly contrived to be impregnated by their own father! They were virgins (v. 8), the married daughters were dead (v. 14) and there were no men left for husbands (v. 25). In fearing they would have no children, they conceived the gross iniquity." MacArthur, J., Jr. (Ed.). (1997). The MacArthur Study Bible (electronic ed., p. 42). Nashville, TN: Word Pub.

"The Peas" ~ PornOReilly
old_man-3569.gif

Have you ever been drunk? Did it make you want to sleep with your dad? No? That's what I thought
 

So many gays!

BANNED
Banned
If one is referencing the world of corruptible genetics that is. The animals and Noah's family (if one takes scripture as literal history) on the ark would have degenerated over a few generations.

You can look at it that way if you wish. But I was simply referring to nature as it has always existed since the inception of sexual, rather than asexual, reproduction
 

serpentdove

BANNED
Banned
[You believe the historical account is lie. I do not.] "I never said that."
SMGs: "Have you ever been drunk? Did it make you want to sleep with your dad? No? That's what I thought."

"There's nothing unbelievable about that story. As your article shows it still happens today, rarely and disgustingly. Does that justify it according to you?"
I am not pro-Sodomite (heterosexual [Lev. 20:10–12]/homosexual [Lev. 20:10,13]), no.
 

bybee

New member
The daughters got him drunk (Ge 19:32).

"Ge 19:31–36 The immoral philosophy of Sodom and Gomorrah had so corrupted the thinking of Lot’s daughters that they unhesitatingly contrived to be impregnated by their own father! They were virgins (v. 8), the married daughters were dead (v. 14) and there were no men left for husbands (v. 25). In fearing they would have no children, they conceived the gross iniquity." MacArthur, J., Jr. (Ed.). (1997). The MacArthur Study Bible (electronic ed., p. 42). Nashville, TN: Word Pub.

"The Peas" ~ PornOReilly
old_man-3569.gif

I think it corrupted Lot.
 

So many gays!

BANNED
Banned
SMGs: "Have you ever been drunk? Did it make you want to sleep with your dad? No? That's what I thought."

I am not pro-Sodomite (heterosexual [Lev. 20:10–12]/homosexual [Lev. 20:10,13]), no.

You have repeated my sentiments that Lot's story is true, but conveniently not answered my question: does his daughters getting him drunk justify Lot sleeping with them? Try not to dodge for your own sake. It looks pitiful
 

Nazaroo

New member
http://www.tektonics.org/tsr/tillstill7-7.html

"Does "cut off" mean "kill" -- making this a particularly harsh penalty?

In some cases, it does seem to, and some scholars agree.

Driver's commentary, for example, argues that
"cut off" is used for both a death penalty and for exclusion from the covenant people;
he supposes it was an "archaic judicial formula" which originally meant a death sentence,
but came to mean "a strong affirmation of divine disapproval." But we'll look at this more closely below."

Boom. Lawyered

S.R. Driver is a crapola out-of-date inaccurate "scholar" from the 'higher criticism' of the 1800s.

Your argument is invalid.


im-chuck-norris-your-argument-is-invalid-thumb.jpg
 

So many gays!

BANNED
Banned

Answered previously, but I'm a gracious guy. I'll repost.

http://www.tektonics.org/tsr/tillstill7-7.html

"cut off" mean "kill" -- making this a particularly harsh penalty?

In some cases, it does seem to, and some scholars agree. Driver's commentary, for example, argues that "cut off" is used for both a death penalty and for exclusion from the covenant people; he supposes it was an "archaic judicial formula" which originally meant a death sentence, but came to mean "a strong affirmation of divine disapproval." But we'll look at this more closely below."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top