Disagree but respect

[musterion]

That scripture is about not making judgments according to human wisdom, such as do not say oh that person is rich, therefore he is better; or, this person is good looking, therefore this person is better.

No it isn't. You made that up and you'll go to Hell for twisting and replacing the Word of God with your own tradition.


@shauna_hale, you getting all this? I've been letting it go on so you can see it for yourself.

 

[God's Truth]

No it isn't. You made that up and you'll go to Hell for twisting and replacing the Word of God with your own tradition.


@shauna_hale, you getting all this? I've been letting it go on so you can see it for yourself.

We are not to judge people according to the way they look, or how rich they are, or their education.

We are to look at people spiritually now.

Are they believers acting in line with the truth?

 

[shauna_hale]

No it isn't. You made that up and you'll go to Hell for twisting and replacing the Word of God with your own tradition.


@shauna_hale, you getting all this? I've been letting it go on so you can see it for yourself.

I'm seeing it. I'm now confused as to the original argument, but that's ok.

Nontrinitarianism is NOT the trinity doctrine. Well, it is for Mormons, Jeh Witnesses, Christian Scientists, Unitarians, etc...saying the trinity doctrine is false made me fall out of my chair, but then she said she believes in the trinity...so, yeah. I'm catching what you're throwing.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

 

[God's Truth]

Trinitarianism says the Three are separate in the sense that they are distinct Persons, yet eternally One. Can we explain how this is? No, not humanly possible. But that is what the Bible teaches when all possible references are taken as a whole.

You never have refuted this..

The Father and Jesus are not different and separate.

Jesus only says and does what the Father says and does.

In fact, when you see Jesus you can say, "I see the Father".

 

[God's Truth]

I'm seeing it. I'm now confused as to the original argument, but that's ok.

Nontrinitarianism is NOT the trinity doctrine. Well, it is for Mormons, Jeh Witnesses, Christian Scientists, Unitarians, etc...saying the trinity doctrine is false made me fall out of my chair, but then she said she believes in the trinity...so, yeah. I'm catching what you're throwing.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

You need to be more careful what you say others say.

Show where I said I believe in the trinity doctrine.

 

[shauna_hale]

You need to be more careful what you say others say.

Show where I said I believe in the trinity doctrine.

God the Father in heaven spoke, and He is the same Spirit that is in Jesus Christ who was getting water baptized.

Here, I read God & Spirit is the same

Nope.

The trinity doctrine says that the Father and Son are separate and different.

I say they are one and the same.

Here I read Jesus & God are the same.
If you do simple math, they're all the same, which equals you believing the Trinity.

Also, the Trinity doctrine agrees with a trinity.

Nontrinitarianism doesn't agree with a trinity.

If you're gonna argue them, please reference the correct terms so that we're all on the same page and can all discuss the same topic. I'm not trying to be snarky, it's what I tell my students, get your terms right.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

 

[musterion]

I'm seeing it. I'm now confused as to the original argument, but that's ok.

With GT, it doesn't matter. The result is ALWAYS the same.

Nontrinitarianism is NOT the trinity doctrine. Well, it is for Mormons, Jeh Witnesses, Christian Scientists, Unitarians, etc...saying the trinity doctrine is false made me fall out of my chair, but then she said she believes in the trinity...so, yeah. I'm catching what you're throwing.

She enjoys trolling people by being inconsistent. Either that or she's insane.

 

[musterion]

The Father and Jesus are not different and separate.

Jesus only says and does what the Father says and does.

In fact, when you see Jesus you can say, "I see the Father".

You need to refute the graphic.

Oh, that's right, you always ignore it.

 

[God's Truth]

Here, I read God & Spirit is the same



Here I read Jesus & God are the same.
If you do simple math, they're all the same, which equals you believing the Trinity.

Also, the Trinity doctrine agrees with a trinity.

Nontrinitarianism doesn't agree with a trinity.

If you're gonna argue them, please reference the correct terms so that we're all on the same page and can all discuss the same topic. I'm not trying to be snarky, it's what I tell my students, get your terms right.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

You are mistaken not knowing what the trinity doctrine says.

 

[God's Truth]

With GT, it doesn't matter. The result is ALWAYS the same.



She enjoys trolling people by being inconsistent. Either that or she's insane.

The Apostle Paul was called insane too. So I am glad to hear it about me.

 

[God's Truth]

You need to refute the graphic.

Oh, that's right, you always ignore it.

The graphic?

 

[JudgeRightly]

The graphic?

This graphic, which has been posted many times in conversations you have been in.

 

[God's Truth]

This graphic, which has been posted many times in conversations you have been in.

I have replied to that a long time ago.

 

[JudgeRightly]

I have replied to that a long time ago.

So then you won't mind doing it again?

Could you go through every point in the image and address them?

 

[God's Truth]

So then you won't mind doing it again?

Could you go through every point in the image and address them?

Maybe if you acknowledge that I have been falsely accused of not answering it.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Maybe if you acknowledge that I have been falsely accused of not answering it.

I can't attest to whether you've answered it already. It would be wrong for me to say you're being wrongly accused because that in and of itself could be wrong.

So how about it, GT, care to respond point by point this graphic?

 

[God's Truth]

I can't attest to whether you've answered it already. It would be wrong for me to say you're being wrongly accused because that in and of itself could be wrong.

So how about it? Could you have falsely accused me of not answering it?

 

[shauna_hale]

You are mistaken not knowing what the trinity doctrine says.

Um, Google it.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

 

[God's Truth]

Um, Google it.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

You still don't know what it teaches.

 

[JudgeRightly]

So how about it? Could you have falsely accused me of not answering it?

GT, you saying you've answered it doesn't prove that you've answered it, and I'm not going to say you have unless you can give me the link to the post where you did refute the graphic.

And the fact that you're still not giving a straight answer as to whether you'll answer it this time around is a good indication that 1) you don't want to answer, and 2) you can't answer it without rejecting Scripture.

So please, cut the rabbit trails, sidestepping, avoiding, and evasiveness, and show that you really can answer, and, at least in my book, it'll show that you have answered it (providing you actually refute each point directly and not just generalize the whole thing, you need to address each specific point).

Here's the image again: