It should have been Ohio State because they were conference champ that didn't end season with a loss
And that's not the determiner. It's a factor.SO WHAT??????? You didn't win your conference. You had your opportunity....and you lost.
No, but they support the committee's decision.So I see, all this is about is statistics. Now I understand.
And if the facts were as they are I'd disagree with you.Your made up assumption clouding your judgement. I can guarantee you if this was Florida, I would be saying the SAME EXACT THING. Win your conference.
lain: Time will tell. I know you can compete for one.:mock: Town, trying to make us all believe you can be a National Champion and cannot even win your conference..what a joke
lain: Time will tell. I know you can compete for one.
It should have been Ohio State because they were conference champ that didn't end season with a loss
If college football were run like the NFL Alabama would still be in the playoffs, because they're good enough to compete. So would a few others worth seeing, like Ohio State.Alabama getting in the CFB playoff is exactly why I like the NFL better. No politics, no strength of schedule. No fluff. Win and you’re in.
Just get rid of conference championships. I guess you can lose your last game and technically finish third in your conference and still make the playoffs.
10. UCF
I hope they win, just on principle alonePoor, little UCF......
12-0, and no respect.
We'll see how they do against Auburn.
Point is, you have a set pattern. Win your division, you're in. Thr nfl adds 2 wild cards to make the top 2 seeds have byes. Under that criteria, Alabama is out.If college football were run like the NFL Alabama would still be in the playoffs, because they're good enough to compete. So would a few others worth seeing, like Ohio State.
Meanwhile, the Associated Press top 25 is out. The Top 10?
1. Clemson
2. Oklahoma
3. Georgia
4. Alabama
5. Ohio State
6. Wisconsin
7. Auburn
8. USC
9. Penn State
10. UCF
No, they'd still be in. The NFL has four wild cards with a shot at the big game. That's a sum of the top 12 teams. Alabama is in any way you look at it, unless you exclude all but conference champions.Point is, you have a set pattern. Win your division, you're in. Thr nfl adds 2 wild cards to make the top 2 seeds have byes. Under that criteria, Alabama is out.
Alabama is in any way you look at it, unless you exclude all but conference champions.
Whatever the selection reason, one thing is certain. The Clemson vs. Alabama game will be the third straight year these teams meet in the CFP, with each winning the championship the last two years.
No matter how much one disagrees with the Alabama selection, watching the "rubber match" of these two teams should be a treat.
Maybe, but is that the reason the AP has Bama ranked fourth? Or the FPI and SOR both putting the Tide soundly within the top four? Look, I'm not saying we're fielding the next National Championship team this year. I'd like to have our LBs back in the mix. I'd rather have an angry team looking in from the outside going into next year, but given the chance to compete this team will compete. No one, not even the momentarily great Tigers, made Alabama look bad. We did that to ourselves and still stayed in that game until late.The selection committee took a lot of criticism last year by selecting Ohio State over Penn State.
Then when Ohio State got crushed 31-0, it made their selection look even worse.
I wonder if picking Alabama over Ohio State this year, was some sort of "revenge" at Ohio State for making them look bad last year?????????
Or, had they chose Ohio State over Alabama this year, and Ohio State got crushed by Clemson again this year, maybe people would accuse them of having an Ohio State bias?
IOW, maybe they were afraid of Clemson crushing Ohio State again in the first round.
I have no solid idea of what will come of it. :cheers:
Including me. Esp when one team shouldn't be in there in the 1st placeAn all SEC championship game (Alabama vs. Georgia) would really upset a lot of people.