Clown World

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Clown world - a deliberate attempt to destroy Western democracies



 

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
Clown world - a deliberate attempt to destroy Western democracies




Richard Dawkins—was on to something with his idea of a meme being like a mind virus. Communism is a meme. And there's no vaccine robust enough to enable you to spend all your time in the presence of the thing. It will infect you eventually if you choose to live in and around the people who are obviously infected with it already. You will succumb.

McCarthy was on to something too. Imprisoning communist agitators should be like putting drunks in the drunk tank to let them sleep it off, it shouldn't take very long, especially if you impose obligatory reeducation and brainwashing reversal classes on the inmates. Like medical rehabilitation, the quicker you can demonstrate your recovered ability to walk around independently, the quicker you can be discharged back into society.
 

Avajs

Active member
Richard Dawkins—was on to something with his idea of a meme being like a mind virus. Communism is a meme. And there's no vaccine robust enough to enable you to spend all your time in the presence of the thing. It will infect you eventually if you choose to live in and around the people who are obviously infected with it already. You will succumb.

McCarthy was on to something too. Imprisoning communist agitators should be like putting drunks in the drunk tank to let them sleep it off, it shouldn't take very long, especially if you impose obligatory reeducation and brainwashing reversal classes on the inmates. Like medical rehabilitation, the quicker you can demonstrate your recovered ability to walk around independently, the quicker you can be discharged back into society.
How about obligatory reeducation for Trump's crack national security team???
 

Avajs

Active member
I'm content to wait until the IT experts thoroughly parse this down to the last line of code to fully understand exactly what happened. I can't understand why Goldberg's contact information would be in anybody's device on the Trump team.
I can certainly agree with that but the basic question is whether this conversation should have been on Signal to begin with.
Further, who do we expect to check this out? Hard to imagine anyone with courage enough to suggest Trump's people are incompetent because that would question the competence of the person who chose them.
 

Nick M

Reconciled by the Cross
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame

The 4 second pause of cognitive dissonance is funny. And it's "expound", Margaret. She will always be a dingbat cocktail waitress.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond

The 4 second pause of cognitive dissonance is funny. And it's "expound", Margaret. She will always be a dingbat cocktail waitress.
You want to see something that will really blow your hair back? From Google:

She attended Boston University, where she double-majored in international relations and economics, graduating with honors.

International relations, with honors, and what she knows about Israel and Palestine would fit in a thimble
 

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
She's an actress, I don't care what her degree's in.

She might be a genius and acting like a ditz, she is playing after all the beauty pageant contestant, only prepared for a softball question, and she didn't get a softball question she got a fastball. She acts like that all the time.

She's SO dramatic, over not just the slightest issues, but over made up situations, situations that she made up herself. Which is all openly AN ACT.

What—we can't believe that she's so consistent a liar always repeating and promoting the same lies that she actually believes them? She's lost touch with reality? Forgot what was true, because she's been at it acting for so long?

If she is that then she is possessed. She's either an actress OR possessed, there's no third option.

But other than being possessed then she's just remarkably dumb AND a horrible actress, but she only has to fool 51% of the people. The fact that 49% are not fooled is IRRELEVANT. The 51% being fooled IS A PROBLEM, not something to laugh at. We need to take her down somehow and expose her. She cannot be in our government, and we shouldn't be above witch hunting and expelling her and even arresting her for deprogramming. Society has always treated dangerous charismatic people like this, extremely. You don't want to imprison them because their influence will continue even from jail, so you'd usually exile them, like Napoleon, like Lenin. Just get them out of the country.

So we could do something like that maybe, let's just not be above any of these things. There's a reason Lenin and Napoleon were exiled, they should have been put to death. Unspeakably large numbers of people wouldn't have been murdered, tortured, mutilated, if Lenin had been executed instead of exiled.

You want to talk about "democracy dying", it'd be someone like AOC rising to power. You get someone like that with a Democratic House and Senate AND Supreme Court—we're all going to die. That diabolic triad would spell our doom. And there's nothing we can do to prevent it from happening unless we treat AOC and others like her seriously. We can't just passively permit someone like that to steal elections by fooling just 51% of the people. We have to step in and do something.

ofc by we, I mean Republicans and by Republicans I mean rn the Trump administration. They have the power of the federal government, and they should go on a witch hunt here. A witch hunt to break her 51% hold she has on us, on New York, and mainly on her district, which is where the critical 51% currently live.

If the Trump administration unleashes just a touch of its Constitutional powers they can snuff out the AOC candle wick. Through actively engaging in very careful exposition of who she really is, compilations of public footage, promoting them like crazy. Meaning, it's all going to speak for itself. There'll be no messaging, it will just be showing footage.

And this isn't to prove to the 51% that she's batty, it's to prove to the 49% that you need to up your game. The 51% can ruin the 49% (along with the 51% themselves because the majority in all cases of bad democratic government are just as vulnerable when the bad regime secures power as the minority), the only thing stopping them is if you go out and make converts.

So the idea is the federal government will pump footage of AOC being AOC, without comment, and then the 49% will use the footage as motivation and for talking points, the 49% will actually do the propaganda, not the government, which can wash its hands of the matter, even though it most certainly was a targeted witch hunt, it was without narrative or spin, so there's no possibility of the sin or crime of attacking your political opponents (which is something the Democrats actually did to Trump with "lawfare" between his terms). Because it's not attack, it's doing what the press refuses to do. It's emergency powers, one of countless emergency powers, that the federal government possesses, if the press ever fails to do its job because it's captured by its ideology, then the federal government can promote footage of politicians and jurists that is in the public square, offering it free of commentary and narrative.

When the 49% take the baton, they will campaign against her, and become the 51%+, and then this will all go away and we can forget about AOC, without having to exile, without having to imprison, or any other fairly transparent human rights violation, which we should never even appear to be doing. Trump has the power to lead the way and expose the worst elements of the Democratic party.
 
Last edited:

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
Imagine the Republican pearl clutching should that little incident have happened in the Biden administration.
Was this a joke?

The entire Biden administration was one HUMONGOUS national security threat! ON PURPOSE!!!

they screwed up, own it.
Someone made a mistake, sure, but it was totally harmless! It isn't the collassal security disaster you mindless liberals are trying to sell it as. You all are stupid and the American public has woken up to it. The story will probably be all but completely gone after today. Certainly it will have died by the end of the weekend because there just isn't anything there of any major consequence.

someone needs to fall on the sword and not blame the app or the journalist. It was a show of incompetence.
No, that's just your own political wet dream. Nothing will come of it because the reality is less than 10% of the propaganda machines you listen to have convinced you it is.
 

Avajs

Active member
Was this a joke?

The entire Biden administration was one HUMONGOUS national security threat! ON PURPOSE!!!


Someone made a mistake, sure, but it was totally harmless! It isn't the collassal security disaster you mindless liberals are trying to sell it as. You all are stupid and the American public has woken up to it. The story will probably be all but completely gone after today. Certainly it will have died by the end of the weekend because there just isn't anything there of any major consequence.


No, that's just your own political wet dream. Nothing will come of it because the reality is less than 10% of the propaganda machines you listen to have convinced you it is.
Which particular propaganda machine is your choice?
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Imagine the Republican pearl clutching should that little incident have happened in the Biden administration. they screwed up, own it. someone needs to fall on the sword and not blame the app or the journalist. It was a show of incompetence.
I'd like to see the result of the investigation. Specifically - why would Waltz have Goldberg's contact information in his phone in such a manner that he would accidentally choose it? If he did accidentally choose it, why wouldn't he have noticed that he was adding "Jeffrey Goldberg" when he was intending to add "General Smith"? Finally why did none of the other two dozen people on the distribution list notice "Jeffrey Goldberg" and call attention to it?
 

Avajs

Active member
I'd like to see the result of the investigation. Specifically - why would Waltz have Goldberg's contact information in his phone in such a manner that he would accidentally choose it? If he did accidentally choose it, why wouldn't he have noticed that he was adding "Jeffrey Goldberg" when he was intending to add "General Smith"? Finally why did none of the other two dozen people on the distribution list notice "Jeffrey Goldberg" and call attention to it?
All good questions. I can understand Waltz having journalists #s in his phone---he might want to give a cogent response to a question. But this seems more like a bunch of guys in a chat about fishing---just friends keeping in touch. However why use anything other than secure government methods to communicate this stuff. Would think that at least Waltz and Rubio would have enough sense to do that. I can understand how fratboy Hegseth might not get that and why Steve Witkoff might not but should they not have been given some training, some instruction on how to deal with internet discussions of sensitive information? This administration is incompetent
And the reaction is standard Trump---deny deny deny--when the smart thing to do would be to admit the mistake right away, don't blame the journalist, maybe fire Waltz. Story over.
And who by the way will be doing any investigation? AG Bondi says not her, dont see the FBI stepping up.
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
All good questions. I can understand Waltz having journalists #s in his phone---he might want to give a cogent response to a question. But this seems more like a bunch of guys in a chat about fishing---just friends keeping in touch. However why use anything other than secure government methods to communicate this stuff. Would think that at least Waltz and Rubio would have enough sense to do that. I can understand how fratboy Hegseth might not get that and why Steve Witkoff might not but should they not have been given some training, some instruction on how to deal with internet discussions of sensitive information? This administration is incompetent
And the reaction is standard Trump---deny deny deny--when the smart thing to do would be to admit the mistake right away, don't blame the journalist, maybe fire Waltz. Story over.
And who by the way will be doing any investigation? AG Bondi says not her, dont see the FBI stepping up.
You're stupid.

Good bye!
 

Nick M

Reconciled by the Cross
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Tonight on X, Aunt Jemima returning to pancake syrup was a topic. And like TOL of old it somehow turned into cross dressing and trannys.
 
Top