Purex... try some listening skills. There is some information
here.
You seem to be completely devoid of that skill. For instance, we cannot get past your first line:
Purex said:
There is nothing logically incoherent about NOT "accounting" for the existence of the sun.
when we replace "sun" with "logic" (as you are using them interchangably here). You are willfully ignorant, so you won't answer this; however, for those who have a modicum of desire to understand, here is the question:
How can we evaluate logic without first having blind faith in logic? If one does want to evaluate logic with logic then please please please be honest and say, "yes, I use logic, and I admit that my faith in logic is completely blind, unsubstantiated, unaccounted for, unverified, unauthenticated, and unable to be calibrated... thus, it
could be wrong, counterfeit, doubtful, dubious, fake, false, fictitious, inaccurate, mythical, spurious, ungenuine, or untrue.". I know Purex won't admit it, but a fair, frank, genuine, honerable, reputable, honest person should. It's because Purex consistently acts like a dullard idiot moron.
My thanks to the thesaurus. Repetition for emphasis.
