Jerry Shugart
Well-known member
The pictures are not of good quality - I think you are seeing what you want to see. I see no issues with the photos.
Despite the fact that several doctors and nurses at Parklend described a large wound in the back of the head and the autopsy photos show no such wound you say that you have "no issues with the photos."
Do you seriously think that all of those doctors and nurses were seeing something which was not there?
Do you think the same of Secret Service agent Clint Hill who was in the back seat with JFK on the way to Parkland and he also saw a large wound in the back of the head?
You say that the photos are not of good quality but if there was a large wound in the back of the head then that wound could be seen because the quality is not that bad.
So you are left with two choices. Either all of the eye-witnesses at Parkland (and Clint Hill) saw something which was not there or are the photos are fakes.
Which choice do you make?