Having the answer, which you know will also be my answer, means you can go a head and explain the implications. You don't need me to say what is already obvious what my answer is. I think you like giving orders, when you can just make your argument. You don't need my submission before you make your point. Taking the opposing view to Mid Acts does not mean Mid Acts is wrong. The opposing view may not be correct. By having a debate we can compare both views and let everyone decide for themselves.
The works of the law alone were never believed to save anyone, the sacrifices in the Temple atoned for the sins for Israel, Jesus death on the cross atones for everyone as the final sacrifice. The works of the law that pertain to Temple life and practice, etc. are no longer needed, but the moral laws contained in the law are what Paul calls the works of the flesh. We were created to do good works--Ephesians 2:10. Doing good works is not sinning or a work of the flesh, it's boasting of your good works in order to be seen of men, and exalting yourself over others is a sin and a work of the flesh. According to Jesus the Pharisees were not wrong for telling the people to observe the law, the works of the Pharisees were not the works of the law, their works were that they were not doing the law, "they say, and do not", they are " full of hypocrisy and iniquity."
Matthew 6:2 Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men.
Matthew 23:1 Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples, 2 Saying The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: 3 All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not do after their works: for they say, and do not...all their works they do for to be seen of men...28 you appear righteous unto men, but within you are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.
--Dave