Chuck Baldwin: My Thoughts On The Movie "American Sniper"

[annabenedetti]

Oh but Jr., a broken cuckoo clock is always right twice a day. While Baldwin does have some good things to say (he writes for a wonderful conservative website "renewamerica.com"), one has to wonder why a Christian pastor would associate with a drug pushing pervert like Ron Paul?

To you, everyone's a pervert. You've perverted the word into meaninglessness.

 

[republicanchick]

first of all
there is already a thread on this in all the rest
did you even look?

second
you just cut and pasted what someone else said
did you see the movie?

third
I didn't read the whole thing

I didn't either

I don't have to. To me, the Iraq and Afganistan war were necessary. True, I don't know everything about the wars, but neither does anyone else.




It was when Pres O had the troops LEAVE that all -- chaos and misery and evil and violence and mayhem broke out..

 

[annabenedetti]

I didn't either

I don't have to. To me, the Iraq and Afganistan war were necessary. True, I don't know everything about the wars, but neither does anyone else.



It was when Pres O had the troops LEAVE that all -- chaos and misery and evil and violence and mayhem broke out..

 

[aCultureWarrior]

To you, everyone's a pervert. You've perverted the word into meaninglessness.

No anna, only people who proudly and unrepentantly live a perverse lifestyle or those like you and Ron Paul who unapologetically promote it.

Care to talk about the history of Muslim aggression throughout the world or are you going to acknowledge your limitations on yet another subject and blow some smokescreens into this thread?

 

[TomO]

To you, everyone's a pervert. You've perverted the word into meaninglessness.

Well, they are simply everywhere. lain:

 

[Christian Liberty]

He's either sympathetic to, or in agreement with 9/11 truthers, from what I remember. He seems to lean to the conspiracy, apocalyptic, one-world government type mindset, which isn't what I'd be looking for in a political representative, no matter at what level of government.

I'm somewhat concerned about one world government, though not really from an "apocolyptic" perspective. That siad, I agree with Chuck on most things: not everything. Take the good and leave the bad behind, same with anyone.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Come on people, give us that Rodney King "Why cantz we all jist get along?" speech and tell us how westernized countries can 'co-exist' with these barbarians if we just mind our own business.

Whose going to be the first to defend these savages:

Jr.? anna? Tom O, kmoney?

 

[TomO]

Come on people, give us that Rodney King "Why cantz we all jist get along?" speech and tell us how westernized countries can 'co-exist' with these barbarians if we just mind our own business.

Whose going to be the first to defend these savages:

Jr.? anna? Tom O, kmoney?

:think: Hmmmmm...Can't recall ever doing anything even remotely similar to "defending" these animals.

But, then you are easily confused.... :sigh:


Protip: Just because I think you are full of bull-hockey doesn't mean I fit into your simplistic little boxes.

 

[The Barbarian]

Baldwin is right about the Iraq war. It was a vanity war, fought because the president wanted it, for personal reasons, not because Saddam was a danger to us.

And while Saddam was a vicious tyrant who savagely persecuted anyone who threatened or seemed to threaten his power, he protected Christians. Not because he was a good person, but because he wanted no religious strife disturbing things. A Christian who got out of line would have been eliminated just as ruthlessly as Islamic militants were eliminated. But most Iraqi Christians, like most Iraqi Muslims were comfortable and prosperous, in spite of having no political rights.

When we removed him, we began the process of the destruction of the Iraqi Christian community.

Throwing away a trillion dollars or so, and a few thousand American lives.

 

[chrysostom]

I'm somewhat concerned about one world government, though not really from an "apocolyptic" perspective. That siad, I agree with Chuck on most things: not everything. Take the good and leave the bad behind, same with anyone.

we will take the good part
if
you happen to vote republican with us

 

[Christian Liberty]

we will take the good part
if
you happen to vote republican with us

Nope, I'm with Chuck on this one. The lesser of evils is still evil.

 

[chrysostom]

Nope, I'm with Chuck on this one. The lesser of evils is still evil.

that makes you evil in my mind

 

[republicanchick]

Nope, I'm with Chuck on this one. The lesser of evils is still evil.

oh, so just choose whichever... ?

how stupid

what? like "Oh, 2 evils... so it doesn't matter which I choose"

dumb as a boxarocks

 

[republicanchick]

that makes you evil in my mind

me too

people outside Jesus's Church are like that. I rest my case vis a vis the notion that we all NEED the Church...



+

 

[republicanchick]

look how icky people are without Christ and HIS Church...

bleh... quite icky..



+++

 

[patrick jane]

True, there were things I liked as well, and who's going to get a candidate they agree with on everything?

Here's where I agree with him completely. This was pre-9/11:

At 3:33: "Our foolish policy in Iraq invites terrorist attacks against U.S. territory and incites the Islamic fundamentalists against us."

Ron Paul's prediction

Ron Paul should have been President, he's a smart man.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Ron Paul should have been President, he's a smart man.

Babe alert?

 

[patrick jane]

Babe alert?

I'm not attracted to Ron, I'm not gay. But many women have a crush on him and Rand.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

I'm not attracted to Ron, I'm not gay. But many women have a crush on him and Rand.

I meant, is this one of Repubchick's babe alerts