chrysostom’s 2015 annual awards
- Thread starter chrysostom
- Start date
the official numbers
2467 views
200 replies
68 my posts
5 days
493 views per day
40 replies per day
12 views per reply
2 reply ratio (others/mine)
2467 views
200 replies
68 my posts
5 days
493 views per day
40 replies per day
12 views per reply
2 reply ratio (others/mine)
the creationists are obviously arguing for a literal translation of the bible
so
why is that important?
is the credibility of the whole bible threatened
if
some parts of it can be shown to be unreliable?
alwight is all over this thread
creation vs evolution
maybe he can give us some perspective
so
why is that important?
is the credibility of the whole bible threatened
if
some parts of it can be shown to be unreliable?
alwight is all over this thread
creation vs evolution
maybe he can give us some perspective
Someone should tell chrys that the official total is actually posted by TOL when you enter the general section.
lain: Except for the breakdown. Those numbers will change as people, for whatever reason, continue to visit them. I suspect that when he launches a new one on the same topic it also impacts the numbers on the old threads by year as people wonder about this or that award or tendency.So by the time he posted this it would be, to use his tactic aimed at me and which this effort relates, a lie by his estimation.
Chrys is therefore untrustworthy and these numbers suspect.
alwight
New member
Tricky question C but since there is no one single direction despite the perhaps straightforward title, I think anything goes, a sounding board for crackpot ideas?
MichaelCadry likes to keep the ball rolling of course in his thread. Currently we apparently even have a flat Earther or perhaps troll who knows? :idunno:
However I don't think anyone actually minds who is being serious and who is simply stirring the pot, there is no animosity which is perhaps rather nice for a change I think.
Tricky question C but since there is no one single direction despite the perhaps straightforward title, I think anything goes, a sounding board for crackpot ideas?
MichaelCadry likes to keep the ball rolling of course in his thread. Currently we apparently even have a flat Earther or perhaps troll who knows? :idunno:
However I don't think anyone actually minds who is being serious and who is simply stirring the pot, there is no animosity which is perhaps rather nice for a change I think.
thank you for that info
and
it makes me wonder
if
I should change the title of this award
or
just drop it completely
MichaelCadry who is leading the way could not be accused of hate
I think we can all agree on that
but
I am curious as to why you spend so much time there
is it just easy pickins?
or
does it help to validate your position?
I hope you stick around so we can continue this discussion
I definitely think you should change the award name. Perhaps the "I oppose evolutionists more than you do" award. :idunno:
alwight
New member
Sorry but I have to keep popping out atm C.
I don't have an agenda on that thread or anywhere else I simply respond to things when I feel there is something to say. I find the idea of a flat Earth is rather amusing but I don't really think Daniel1611 actually believes it himself, simply being an advocate.
You can't really get angry at MichaelCadry, he has nothing but goodwill for everyone, while he seems to have so many things going on in his own life that he could get angry about but doesn't. Then again Michael is visited by angels.
genuineoriginal
New member
I think Nazaroo starts more thread against evolution than any other poster, but I haven't counted them.
the official numbers
2915 views
209 replies
71 my replies
6 days
486 views per day
35 replies per day
14 views per reply
2 reply ratio (others/mine)
2915 views
209 replies
71 my replies
6 days
486 views per day
35 replies per day
14 views per reply
2 reply ratio (others/mine)
still open for nominations
I think I understand the motivation of the creationists
but
what about the evolutionists?
are they just showing off their knowledge of science?
never was big on science
but
I am a retired engineer
and
the only time I get interested in it
is
when they take a closer look at the atom
and
find there is nothing there
it is just a facade
an illusion of a non dual nature
this is being added to my last post in an effort to keep my reply ratio up
town will understand this
but
what about the evolutionists?
are they just showing off their knowledge of science?
never was big on science
but
I am a retired engineer
and
the only time I get interested in it
is
when they take a closer look at the atom
and
find there is nothing there
it is just a facade
an illusion of a non dual nature
this is being added to my last post in an effort to keep my reply ratio up
town will understand this
genuineoriginal
New member
You should remove noguru from the list and add him to the "I hate Creationists more than you do" nominees.
can someone else confirm this?
Is there a reply ratio award? Surely you'd do it for Randolph.
who is randolph?
the reply ratio is just for town who is trying to discredit my efforts here
and
thanks to all for your replies
every one counts
did you see stripe hanging around?
he left without a word
I could use another reply
Randolph Scott. Town adores old movie stars.
genuineoriginal
New member
this is embarrassing
and
I stand corrected
noguru is off the list
he won last year
and
I was corrected by rainee then
but
did not pay attention
thanks to all who helped
my apologies to noguru who took it with a grin
last call for nominations and discussion
we have to move on
this one is really hurting my numbers