What I meant was: The surface feature we see at the triple point is unique.
It should have been obvious that I wasn't saying plate tectonics theory does not have other points where three plates meet.
For example, there are nine in your image, but none of them show a surface feature like what we see in the Indian Ocean. Why is that?
Evolutionists hate reading.What is the particular surface feature and why is it there? Please explain.
Stripe, you made a reference to a particular feature and "why it is there?'.Evolutionists hate reading.
so you're pitching a hissy because you don't like stripe's presentation of his Christianity?
explain to us again how you are in any position to judge
kinda like a child whining that the adults are mean to him and stamping his foot and yelling that if they're not nicer, he's not going to grow up
Very unChristian...
Stripe, you made a reference to a particular feature and "why it is there?'.
I asked you to explain further.
You didn't read what I already said.
Learn to read; then you might be able to join the conversation. :up:
what basis do you have to make this judgement?
Stripe's history on TOL and my years of both Catholic school education and Bible study with evangelicals.
I asked a specific question and you cannot take the time or make the effort to answer it. Instead you whine.
Matthew 28:20 suggests that Christians should teach. You make no effort to do that.
all those years of education and study and you're still just a hell-bound fool
:sigh:
Can you explain any of this from the perspective of the proposed mechanism driving plate tectonic theory?
Ah, plate tectonics. A theory arguably dumber than CD because it has no observed mechanism to explain how huge plates just move all by themselves.