God's Truth
New member
Calvinists, God does NOT save those who hate Him and do not believe in Him.
You are in a snare.
You are in a snare.
There is something all Calvinists cannot get around, and it is that God does not give His Spirit to cause someone to believe in Him. God does not save those who do not believe in Him and hate Him.
So pathetic is Faither.
Faither, no one can surrender to God unless they obey Him and stop sinning.
You are in a snare.
Love begets Obedience which begets, Faith.
I'll bite , but you start that misrepresentation and name-calling again , you go back into your room .
Explain what you just said .
Explain how you fulfill the obedience that results in recieving Faith .
And explain what the Faith is that you receive by said obedience .
Define LOVE make application and begin from there.
That is all I need to answer you. Now you answer me. Start with defining LOVE and how it begins that obedience becomes a no brainer. Can you do that? I hope so. Go for it.That's the answer to your own statement ?
That is all I need to answer you. Now you answer me. Start with defining LOVE and how it begins that obedience becomes a no brainer. Can you do that? I hope so. Go for it.
. . .and good nite.
OMT: Did you watch the Youtube teaching that mentioned Gene Scott?
Ya , for about 3 minutes . When he said he gets his spiritual direction from Jim Nabors , I knew he was as credible as you are .
He was meaning to say Jim Peterson, the author of the book.
I know the man personally. I can assure you it is the book/church Mumford is making reference to, not Nabors you would have it to be that would contaminate the church in a generation. . . . . I wonder what Scottie's views were that he would follow suit before God removed him from the scene and expose the remaining carcass for all to gaze upon?
Dr. Scott is known for possibly being the greatest Bible teacher since the apostle Paul . He called a teachers teacher because he would go into ministries that were failing , and show them how to get back on the right path by God's word .
He loved to teach in ways that would activate what dwelt in people who thought they wanted to follow Christ . More times than not , a violent hated emerged , directed right at him . But then people could see what was really in them . Kind of like you CR , you are so full of hate , I can sense you spend your time thinking of how to express it better . I think that obvious right ?
U: Unconditional election – God chooses those to be saved based solely on His will:
Unconditional election is proved to be a blasphemy in that it also indicates that GOD's passing some over for salvation is based solely on HIS will yet scripture indicates HE does not want anyone to be damned but to be saved implying they damn themselves against HIS will.
Unconditional means without reason and if our election is unconditional then so is the damnation of the reprobate no matter how many thousands of books of theo-babble say otherwise. GOD must have had a reason to reject some from HIS heaven and the reverse side of that reason is the reason HE elected some and not others...
...even if it is true that there is no consideration of our sinful EARTHLY lives as the basis for election requiring that our election was based upon our choices before our sinful life on earth, before we were sown into the world by the Son of Man.
You have horribly misinterpreted 2 Peter 3:9. The context of 2 Peter 3 proves that forcing God to will all humanity to be saved is an incorrect teaching. Therefore your assertion is wrong.
Yet, you ignore the context of 2 Peter 3, which proves your claim to be utterly wrong.I do not advocate that 2 Peter 3:9 implies universal salvation (though I expected someone to jump topic with that word) but that HIS unwillingness that any be damned only contradicts the idea that HE created some people knowing they were going to end in hell, ie, just to go to hell...and exposes the blasphemy of Unconditional election and non-election.