:rotfl:
Did a liberal really just say that :freak:
You ought to to just change the donkey to a gay man in a rainbow skirt.
Yes, what's your obsession with homosexuality?
:rotfl:
Did a liberal really just say that :freak:
You ought to to just change the donkey to a gay man in a rainbow skirt.
did you read the stat at all?
Sure...
Oh, i don't see hetero sex parades with signs telling what we do in the bed.
what did it say?
They don't have to, nobody is obsessed and hostile against heterosexuality.
It said blacks, women, heteros get HIV. Why the spotlight on homos?
Yes, what's your obsession with homosexuality?
well, i'd rather that young people be taught that sexuality should be kept within a Christian marriage
instead being handed condoms in 6th grade and taught how to use them
They don't have to, nobody is obsessed and hostile against heterosexuality.
I have no obsession with it- God calls it an abomination and that's so that is what it is. You all are the one's desperately attacking Christianity and bringing things to the Supreme Court; running around shoving it down people's throats and ruining people's livelihoods to perpetuate it :idunno:
because its normal
No I can't. Pedophilia causes demonstrable harm.
It's not a mere ideological objection.
Demonstrable harm:
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.htmlGay and bisexual menb are the population most affected by HIV. In 2015c:
Gay and bisexual men accounted for 82% (26,375) of HIV diagnoses among males and 67% of all diagnoses.
Black/African Americand gay and bisexual men accounted for the largest number of HIV diagnoses (10,315), followed by white gay and bisexual men (7,570).
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html
Again, why the spotlight on homos?
And nothing is being shoved down homosexuals throats by way of being described as "God's abomination"?
Glass house you live in Cruc?
Because you said a behavior is wrong only because of demonstrable harm so i gave you an example, but like the typical liberal, when shown wrong, all of a sudden you no longer remember or understand the conversation.
People rarely talked about homosexuality until you all went on a crusade to shape public opinion toward acceptance of it. It being wrong has been a fundamental notion throughout all of Christian history, from Rome to America. It has always been a taboo culture, and will always remain that way, if not partially, regardless of your obsessive need to mythologize it as morally intact or natural.
So?
That's justification for your obsessiveness?
Again, is a foot fetish "normal"?
Because you said a behavior is wrong only because of demonstrable harm so i gave you an example, but like the typical liberal, when shown wrong, all of a sudden you no longer remember or understand the conversation.
no, there was a stat in there - a statistic - a number
a couple of numbers, actually
did you miss them?
Invalid comparison.
Why's that?