Last edited:
BEL: Bob changes tactics re: Homo... 06-27-2003
- Thread starter Nathon Detroit
- Start date
Re: BEL: Bob changes tactics re: Homo... 06-27-2003
Knight, I got a "not found" message on that one.
Knight, I got a "not found" message on that one.
Re: Re: BEL: Bob changes tactics re: Homo... 06-27-2003
Re: Re: BEL: Bob changes tactics re: Homo... 06-27-2003
Its that way on the KGOV site as well.
Re: Re: BEL: Bob changes tactics re: Homo... 06-27-2003
Yea... me too.
Its that way on the KGOV site as well.
OK. Just making sure you knew about it.
I didn't... until you "hipped" me to that fact!
Good job and thanks!
:jazz:
Not a problem. I like listening to him. I'll miss it tonight.
Link is fixed; homosexual problem is not...
Link is fixed; homosexual problem is not...
Sorry guys, the link is now fixed from KGOV. Yes, I've decided to change my tactic when talking about homosexuals. -Bob
Link is fixed; homosexual problem is not...
Sorry guys, the link is now fixed from KGOV. Yes, I've decided to change my tactic when talking about homosexuals. -Bob
What's the rationale for the change?
What's the rationale for the change?
I listened to the show but couldn't find a clear rationale given for the change in tactic. Is it that:
- Bob gives up on homos
- Bob gives into political correctness
- There are more important topics
.....
???
What's the rationale for the change?
I listened to the show but couldn't find a clear rationale given for the change in tactic. Is it that:
- Bob gives up on homos
- Bob gives into political correctness
- There are more important topics
.....
???
john724:
John, I'm confused about your confusion. I thought the reason was given directly. If you'd like, you can indicate the reason you heard, and (if I see this thread again), I'll be happy (or one of the other listeners possibly), to comment. -Bob
John, I'm confused about your confusion. I thought the reason was given directly. If you'd like, you can indicate the reason you heard, and (if I see this thread again), I'll be happy (or one of the other listeners possibly), to comment. -Bob
Based on listening again, I'd say that the change in tactic was because:
It didn't generate enough momentum to be effective.
Bob compared his "over the top" approach to homosexuality with the abortion/Operation Rescue effort.
As Bob expressed, Operation Rescue lost effectiveness due to Christians being unwilling to risk the increasing likelihood they would spend years in jail for blocking access to murder clinics.
However, there is as of yet no such risk for Christians (at least in the US). The Supreme Court's supreme mistake (just another actually) should embolden Christians to be more "over the top" now that it's a frequent national news item. It's on people's radar screens. Homo-related news is on TV everyday and there's somewhat of backlash building. The unwashed masses are beginning to recognize that homos won't just go away (or stay in the closet) and that homos are beginning to infringe upon they're rights, viewing habits, ability to hold their lunch, etc.
Maybe Bob needs another H-free month to renew his energy on this issue.
BTW: Does this mean no more gay-away or dyke-off?
Coming soon: NoMoreHomos.com
It didn't generate enough momentum to be effective.
Bob compared his "over the top" approach to homosexuality with the abortion/Operation Rescue effort.
As Bob expressed, Operation Rescue lost effectiveness due to Christians being unwilling to risk the increasing likelihood they would spend years in jail for blocking access to murder clinics.
However, there is as of yet no such risk for Christians (at least in the US). The Supreme Court's supreme mistake (just another actually) should embolden Christians to be more "over the top" now that it's a frequent national news item. It's on people's radar screens. Homo-related news is on TV everyday and there's somewhat of backlash building. The unwashed masses are beginning to recognize that homos won't just go away (or stay in the closet) and that homos are beginning to infringe upon they're rights, viewing habits, ability to hold their lunch, etc.
Maybe Bob needs another H-free month to renew his energy on this issue.
BTW: Does this mean no more gay-away or dyke-off?
Coming soon: NoMoreHomos.com
some other dude
New member
It's a dead link again, but it got me wondering. Given the unprecedented integration of things homosexual into our culture in the past eight years, what are Bob's thoughts on this today?
The link is fine. Try this:
http://kgov.s3.amazonaws.com/bel/2003/20030627-BEL127.mp3
http://kgov.s3.amazonaws.com/bel/2003/20030627-BEL127.mp3