Hey righties....just curious but are you guys for abortion in cases of illegal aliens with unwanted fetuses? :Wamba:
Back to the subject you brought up:
Are you in favor of murdering the unborn offspring of illegal aliens...even if they are raped?
Hey righties....just curious but are you guys for abortion in cases of illegal aliens with unwanted fetuses? :Wamba:
Back to the subject you brought up:
Are you in favor of murdering the unborn offspring of illegal aliens...even if they are raped?
I'm in favor of the liberty of choice....even if they are illegal.
Would you also extend this “liberty of choice” to them if they chose to run a dog fighting ring?
No, that's illegal :duh: and has nothing to do with the liberty to choose abortion or not. :duh:
Why do you suppose it’s illegal to get pitbulls to fight each other
but ripping a small human to pieces (unless of course there is a buyer for organs, then care is taken how the body is crushed) is not?
Teach yourself something by learning to discern the major differences between the two...then get back to me.
Otherwise, the only thing your rhetoic serves is in displaying your self-serving ignorance.
You're stuck in a corner so you're trying to chew through the wall.
How's that? You're against abortion -- I'm stuck in a corner?
...if you say so. :idunno:
(BTW, have you figured out the difference betwixt the former two?)
The US is pushing abortion in LA as a justifiable homicide clearly misleading Latinos as to the legal aspects of how abortion is legal in the US. I know part of this is done on purpose by the abortionists given they are well financed and without principal, after all if you are willing to kill a child you will do or say anything to further your agenda, and another part is the language issue further made more complicated by the American presses lack of credible reporting.
This is creating a lot of legal precedence that could be used by the Supreme Court to fight any legal challenges to abortion or laws that get approved, such as the RCC is currently been trying to do since 1973, because we already have Human Life laws here. Ironically this legal precedence is based on propaganda but that wouldn't make a difference to the SC.
US.
I suppose the only real argument for abortion in the event of rape is in the emotional trauma of the victim. It could be proposed that the fetus is a token of the event, and that the child would be a living reminder.