alwight
New member
A retired Christian?lol,,I'm a Christian I was 28 when I retired,,,
Agnostic these days then?
A retired Christian?lol,,I'm a Christian I was 28 when I retired,,,
Well yeah, many minor actions and quotes that are attributed to historical figures are of questionable veracity. Major events and actions are generally easier to corroborate because they leave more evidence/contemporaneous reports.That limits to a very specific kind of history. More parts of history is about what some historical figures did and said which can hardly be evidenced.
Independent recording of the sentence by contemporary sources is best. Eg. Someone present at the time writes about it. Even then we have to have an air of scepticism, since people lie or get things wrong.Apples and oranges, not every scenarios share what is common to known wars. Most of them can only be conveyed by witnessing. Answer me, how can a sentence said by a historical figure be evidenced?
So I should become a Muslim then? They seem to have a monopoly on martyrs nowadays and claim Jesus as a prophet anyway!The trick is, no witnessing can be made more valid then those martyred themselves for what is said and done.
A retired Christian?
Agnostic these days then?
lol,,I'm a Christian I was 28 when I retired,,,
I was 54 when I retired 10 years ago, I sometimes struggle to fill the time these days which probably accounts for my time here.twist it if you like,I'm still christian. And no,me and a few friends became partners back in 79 we started with one store,worked our way up to 13 ,then we bought a Dairy Queen franchise. After a certain point I just thought I needed not to struggle any further and I sold my portion. There's a way to do it either way,honest or dishonest,the dishonest cannot figure out how to do it either way,,,
I was 54 when I retired 10 years ago, I sometimes struggle to fill the time these days which probably accounts for my time here.
That doesn't worry me too much, we are all advocates for a specific point of view, but even trolls need to find out which buttons to push. Those I suspect of being trolls or insincere are those I generally try and make work harder than I do at it.I'm 55 I've followed the internet christian forums since aol stated they broke the 1mill member thing,lol,,,,it's an odd path I have found Christians who on one forum were Satanist,,who now use the same screen-name and are christian,and Christians who hate certain denominations so much they join forums and claim to be those to make them look bad. Take the list of screen names and search "screen name,profile" and see how many of them you find are enemy's here and are friends elsewhere,,,
That doesn't worry me too much, we are all advocates for a specific point of view, but even trolls need to find out which buttons to push. Those I suspect of being trolls or insincere are those I generally try and make work harder than I do at it.
Not do you think you're right--do you hope that you are right that there is no God and therefore no ultimate justice in the afterlife?
You can dismiss me and the countless others who have experienced the goodness of Allah. You can refuse to seek Him to surrender to Him. You can snub your nose at what countless say is good, and say. You can say I'm not gonna try him just cause so many say He is good. And you will miss out on the only way your science will confirm Allah. Trial and error. Or your pride can keep you holding your breath that He will stand before in all His Glory before it's too late for you. It your choice.
Is that a compelling argument for Islam? No? Now you know why it's not a compelling argument for Christianity either.
Absolutely, and this has been pointed out to him many times, yet he is unable, or unwilling to even acknowledge the point.
I'd prefer to rot in hell than spending an eternity praising a dictator. I don't mind if I get eternal hell, I will suffer and you will be enjoying my suffering, watching the show from above, licking the boots of my executioner, while He enjoys the sanguinary show as well... and one day, you'll ask yourself if that was really fair, if maybe you chose the wrong side...
You have no idea what a God does any more than you have been able to produce a single shred of evidence that yours, in particular, actually exists.
And in addition, this particular thread was specifically directed at atheists, and if you think atheists and sceptics are going to be swayed by preaching then you have much to learn. There are many on this board who can hold a conversation without preaching at people.
You can believe what you like, I don't care what you do with your mind, but I value my rationality and I am not going to buy a bunch of mumbo jumbo from some dude on the internet.
I have urged you to make your own critical examination of your cherished beliefs but you won't do that. Your preaching is wasted on me so please find someone else to preach at. Thanks.
You have no idea what a God does any more than you have been able to produce a single shred of evidence that yours, in particular, actually exists.
And in addition, this particular thread was specifically directed at atheists, and if you think atheists and sceptics are going to be swayed by preaching then you have much to learn. There are many on this board who can hold a conversation without preaching at people.
You can believe what you like, I don't care what you do with your mind, but I value my rationality and I am not going to buy a bunch of mumbo jumbo from some dude on the internet.
I have urged you to make your own critical examination of your cherished beliefs but you won't do that. Your preaching is wasted on me so please find someone else to preach at. Thanks.
Well yeah, many minor actions and quotes that are attributed to historical figures are of questionable veracity. Major events and actions are generally easier to corroborate because they leave more evidence/contemporaneous reports.
Independent recording of the sentence by contemporary sources is best. Eg. Someone present at the time writes about it. Even then we have to have an air of scepticism, since people lie or get things wrong.
But then again most people aren't basing important decisions on the sentence so don't care that there remains a degree of doubt.
Unfortunately the bible seems to fail to have even this however.
So I should become a Muslim then? They seem to have a monopoly on martyrs nowadays and claim Jesus as a prophet anyway!
In reality we do not have witnessing of martyrs from Christianity anyway, we have books written by unknown authors well after the claimed events.
I'd prefer to rot in hell than spending an eternity praising a dictator. I don't mind if I get eternal hell, I will suffer and you will be enjoying my suffering, watching the show from above, licking the boots of my executioner, while He enjoys the sanguinary show as well... and one day, you'll ask yourself if that was really fair, if maybe you chose the wrong side...
As I see it Jamie, human beings from all around the world, whether from isolated or large communities, typically have a perhaps innate dualistic desire to suppose in the existence of a higher power, and have accordingly all developed their own versions of religious belief. They will all of course want to believe that their own particular religious belief is superior to all the rest.A loving relationship with the creator of the universe, and further unity with Him through His Spirit, and Sons payment for sin. Is different than all religions. Saying Christianity can't be true because others say theirs is true is no argument against Christ. You all can pretend you don't want and need His love, but you know that is not true. It is a need of all humans that no one can satisfy except Him.
But others say they are right. Try them and you shall see... Knowing Jesus, is unlike all the others. Don't be afraid to try Him. Letting go of your own personal kingdom of yourself will be freeing. The only way you will ever know is if you try Him on for size. Don't be deceived it doesnt involve just believing He exists as some say on here. He doesn't want your view. He wants you. He loves you.
You discredit my experiences with your opinions about the supernatural. I discredit your opinions with my experiences with the Supernatural.
You don't have read my posts. I do have to defend the truth.