At least one black man realizes the DNC is trying to exterminate blacks in America

[marke]

I wrote these words elsewhere in an article where it's author stated "Conservatives should gamble and vote for Donald Trump":

I don't "gamble" when it comes to electing a President who doesn't even acknowledge the Constitution as the law of the land. I don't gamble” with a unrepentant moral degenerate who amongst other things has been on the cover of and interviewed for the pornographic magazine Playboy. I don’t “gamble” by voting for someone who invited a proud and unrepentant homosexual to speak at the Republican National Convention and who doesn't even state that he'll back the pro traditional family Party Platform. I don’t “gamble” by voting for someone who doesn’t even have the decency to protect little girls and women by supporting laws like North Carolina’s “bathroom bill” which prohibits cross dressing moral degenerates from using restrooms, fitting rooms and gym locker rooms of the opposite sex.
I especially don’t “gamble” when God defines in Holy Scripture what the role of civil government is (to do good as seen through His eyes).
No Erik, when it comes to our great country and its leaders, I’m not a gambling man.

I will be voting in the fall for what I consider is the best shot at keeping wickedness as far under control as possible, considering what we are being forced to deal with.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

I will be voting in the fall for what I consider is the best shot at keeping wickedness as far under control as possible, considering what we are being forced to deal with.

Then you will be going against biblical standards and voting for who you believe is "the lesser of two evils".

Before you mark X on your ballot, consult with God.

 

[Catholic Crusader]

 

[Catholic Crusader]

 

[MrDante]

The claims that Margaret Sanger was a racist is one of the least credible and more pathetic lies put out by the religious right. (I rank it just above the delusional claim that Hitler and the entire SS were gay and orchestrated the Holocaust)

Fact checking the Sanger claims.

Sanger herself was anti-abortion

Early evolutionist scientists and science organization leaders put blacks in cages on display to showcase the fact (as they supposed) of evolution.

This would be difficult to do as the first modern "human zoo" was put on by P.T. Barnum as part of his circus decades before the publication of the Origin of Species.

part of Sanger was a lot like Sandra Fluke - pretty, intelligent, whorish, and wickedly opposed to God and moral behavior. Like Hitler and early government eugenicists, she saw ridding the world of those less evolved or less fit or less intelligent or those who were impoverished or sick as advantageous to the rest of the world.

Just try to back this up with actual evidence.

 

[Catholic Crusader]

The claims that Margaret Sanger was a racist is one of the least credible and more pathetic lies put out by the religious right........

You're a liar MrDonkey. She was a racist and a murderer just like the Democrat Party is, racists and murderers.

 

[Catholic Crusader]

The Truth About MARGARET SANGER
http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger.html
How Planned Parenthood Duped America

At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the "black" and "yellow" peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger's American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

Sanger's other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as "scientific" and "humanitarian." And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America's human "breeding stock" and purging America's "bad strains." These "strains" included the "shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South."

Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization.: And she also spike of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped." That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered "unfit" cannot be easily refuted.

While Planned Parenthood's current apologists try to place some distance between the eugenics and birth control movements, history definitively says otherwise. The eugenic theme figured prominently in the Birth Control Review, which Sanger founded in 1917. She published such articles as "Some Moral Aspects of Eugenics" (June 1920), "The Eugenic Conscience" (February 1921), "The purpose of Eugenics" (December 1924), "Birth Control and Positive Eugenics" (July 1925), "Birth Control: The True Eugenics" (August 1928), and many others.

These eugenic and racial origins are hardly what most people associate with the modern Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA), which gave its Margaret Sanger award to the late Dr. Martin Luther King in 1966, and whose current president, Faye Wattleton, is black, a former nurse, and attractive.

Though once a social pariah group, routinely castigated by religious and government leaders, the PPFA is now an established, high-profile, well-funded organization with ample organizational and ideological support in high places of American society and government. Its statistics are accepted by major media and public health officials as "gospel"; its full-page ads appear in major newspapers; its spokespeople are called upon to give authoritative analyses of what America's family policies should be and to prescribe official answers that congressmen, state legislator and Supreme Court justiices all accept as "social orthodoxy.........(SNIP)

Continue here: http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger.html

 

[Nick M]

(I wonder if Nicky will call me a "faggot" and a "dyke" again if I remind him that Donald Trump incessantly defends Planned Parenthood?)

You have a demon. Rusha is on your side. I like shining the light of truth on the heathens.

 

[marke]

Then you will be going against biblical standards and voting for who you believe is "the lesser of two evils".

Before you mark X on your ballot, consult with God.

Are you voting only for true Christians? If so, how many candidates will you be voting for? Did I understand you to suggest that Huckabee and Palin are not true Christians?

 

[Catholic Crusader]

Trump is a good person with severe flaws. What's your excuse?

If you consider embracing immoral behaviors and ideology a "flaw".....

You engage in immoral behaviors every day here. Your constant lying is an extremely immoral behavior. At least Trump gave his up years ago, but you are still a bald faced liar every day. Trump has a better shot at heaven than you do. He has changed - you have not.

 

[MrDante]

The Truth About MARGARET SANGER
http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger.html
How Planned Parenthood Duped America

At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the "black" and "yellow" peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger's American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

Sanger's other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as "scientific" and "humanitarian." And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America's human "breeding stock" and purging America's "bad strains." These "strains" included the "shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South."

Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization.: And she also spike of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped." That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered "unfit" cannot be easily refuted.

While Planned Parenthood's current apologists try to place some distance between the eugenics and birth control movements, history definitively says otherwise. The eugenic theme figured prominently in the Birth Control Review, which Sanger founded in 1917. She published such articles as "Some Moral Aspects of Eugenics" (June 1920), "The Eugenic Conscience" (February 1921), "The purpose of Eugenics" (December 1924), "Birth Control and Positive Eugenics" (July 1925), "Birth Control: The True Eugenics" (August 1928), and many others.

These eugenic and racial origins are hardly what most people associate with the modern Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA), which gave its Margaret Sanger award to the late Dr. Martin Luther King in 1966, and whose current president, Faye Wattleton, is black, a former nurse, and attractive.

Though once a social pariah group, routinely castigated by religious and government leaders, the PPFA is now an established, high-profile, well-funded organization with ample organizational and ideological support in high places of American society and government. Its statistics are accepted by major media and public health officials as "gospel"; its full-page ads appear in major newspapers; its spokespeople are called upon to give authoritative analyses of what America's family policies should be and to prescribe official answers that congressmen, state legislator and Supreme Court justiices all accept as "social orthodoxy.........(SNIP)

Continue here: http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger.html

You really don't give two cents about truth do you?

Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization.: And she also spike of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped."

What Sanger actually said:
"Society is divided into three groups. Those intelligent and wealthy members of the upper classes who have obtained knowledge of Birth Control and exercise it in regulating the size of their families. They have already benefited by this knowledge, and are today considered the most respectable and moral members of the community. They have only children when they desire, and all society points to them as types that should perpetuate their kind.

The second group is equally intelligent and responsible. They desire to control the size of their families, but are unable to obtain knowledge or to put such available knowledge into practice.

The third are those irresponsible and reckless ones having little regard for the consequence of their acts, or whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers. Many of this group are diseased, feeble-minded, and are of the pauper element dependent entirely upon the normal and fit members of society for their support. There is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped. For if they are not able to support and care for themselves, they should certainly not be allowed to bring offspring into this world for others to look after. We do not believe that filling the earth with misery, poverty and disease is moral. And it is our desire and intention to carry on our crusade until the perpetuation of such conditions has ceased.".


Nothing at all about black people of white people or yellow people...

 

[Catholic Crusader]

You're an idiot.

 

[ClimateSanity]

You engage in immoral behaviors every day here. Your constant lying is an extremely immoral behavior. At least Trump gave his up years ago, but you are still a bald faced liar every day. Trump has a better shot at heaven than you do. He has changed - you have not.

Exactly. Always beware of those pointing the morality finger at others. They are immoral too but "theirs is ok". :chuckle:

 

[Nick M]

ACW is s demon possessed pervert whose goal is the election of those that will silence the gospel. Start a thread about nazis and the DNC, and he carries on about Trump. That is called a red herring.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Are you voting only for true Christians? If so, how many candidates will you be voting for? Did I understand you to suggest that Huckabee and Palin are not true Christians?

Unlike you marke, I've done my homework. While I haven't sat in church next to the politicians that I'm voting for at the local, county, state and federal level and demanded that they tell me their history when it comes to their Christian faith, I'll guarantee you that they won't be getting backing by abortionists and homosexuals like Donald Trump is getting.

If Donald Trump is elected (and I believe that Ted Cruz called it correctly early in the campaign when he said that Trump will lose to Clinton by double digits), you'll have quit a "diverse" crowd that you can congratulate.

Spoiler

Regarding Huckabee and Palin:

I referred to Mike Huckabee as "Hucksterbee" in another thread due to his liberal views.

I've been suspicious of Palin for sometime now because of her Libertarian leanings. I can give specifics later, just ask.

 

[Wick Stick]

You really don't give two cents about truth do you?




What Sanger actually said:
"Society is divided into three groups. Those intelligent and wealthy members of the upper classes who have obtained knowledge of Birth Control and exercise it in regulating the size of their families. They have already benefited by this knowledge, and are today considered the most respectable and moral members of the community. They have only children when they desire, and all society points to them as types that should perpetuate their kind.

The second group is equally intelligent and responsible. They desire to control the size of their families, but are unable to obtain knowledge or to put such available knowledge into practice.

The third are those irresponsible and reckless ones having little regard for the consequence of their acts, or whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers. Many of this group are diseased, feeble-minded, and are of the pauper element dependent entirely upon the normal and fit members of society for their support. There is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped. For if they are not able to support and care for themselves, they should certainly not be allowed to bring offspring into this world for others to look after. We do not believe that filling the earth with misery, poverty and disease is moral. And it is our desire and intention to carry on our crusade until the perpetuation of such conditions has ceased.".


Nothing at all about black people of white people or yellow people...

So, it's ok to discriminate against the poor, as long as race doesn't enter into it? smh

 

[marke]

You really don't give two cents about truth do you?
What Sanger actually said:
"Society is divided into three groups. Those intelligent and wealthy members of the upper classes who have obtained knowledge of Birth Control and exercise it in regulating the size of their families. They have already benefited by this knowledge, and are today considered the most respectable and moral members of the community. They have only children when they desire, and all society points to them as types that should perpetuate their kind.

The second group is equally intelligent and responsible. They desire to control the size of their families, but are unable to obtain knowledge or to put such available knowledge into practice.

The third are those irresponsible and reckless ones having little regard for the consequence of their acts, or whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers. Many of this group are diseased, feeble-minded, and are of the pauper element dependent entirely upon the normal and fit members of society for their support. There is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped. For if they are not able to support and care for themselves, they should certainly not be allowed to bring offspring into this world for others to look after. We do not believe that filling the earth with misery, poverty and disease is moral. And it is our desire and intention to carry on our crusade until the perpetuation of such conditions has ceased.".


Nothing at all about black people of white people or yellow people...

The educated elite of Western cultures 100-150 years ago typically saw blacks as inferior races of humans, and several notable scientists or science organizations participated in putting blacks on display in cages to showcase their idea that humans had evolved from monkeys.

 

[marke]

Unlike you marke, I've done my homework. While I haven't sat in church next to the politicians that I'm voting for at the local, county, state and federal level and demanded that they tell me their history when it comes to their Christian faith, I'll guarantee you that they won't be getting backing by abortionists and homosexuals like Donald Trump is getting.

If Donald Trump is elected (and I believe that Ted Cruz called it correctly early in the campaign when he said that Trump will lose to Clinton by double digits), you'll have quit a "diverse" crowd that you can congratulate.

Spoiler

Regarding Huckabee and Palin:

I referred to Mike Huckabee as "Hucksterbee" in another thread due to his liberal views.

I've been suspicious of Palin for sometime now because of her Libertarian leanings. I can give specifics later, just ask.

In America today all conservative Christians should encourage other Christians in politics in spite of their flaws. We are being overrun by atheists and false religionists whose philosophies are not only wrong for religious reasons, they are traitorous and destructive to American freedoms and values.

We will never have any influence over Hitlery and her savage supporters, but we may have some influence over Christians with varied views, and even non-Christians who show some respect for Christian and constiututional views.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

In America today all conservative Christians

There is only one kind of Christian: those who conserve the teachings of Jesus Christ.

should encourage other Christians in politics in spite of their flaws.

You're confusing someone having a few personal flaws with someone who embraces immoral behavior.

We are being overrun by atheists and false religionists whose philosophies are not only wrong for religious reasons, they are traitorous and destructive to American freedoms and values.

I'd ask you to list the Christian qualifications of Donald Trump, but you'd be far fetched to find any.

We will never have any influence over Hitlery...

Sock puppet alert! Sock puppet alert! (patrick jane, etc. etc. etc., is that you?).

and her savage supporters, but we may have some influence over Christians with varied views, and even non-Christians who show some respect for Christian and constiututional views.

Make your case for Donald Trump showing that God-fearing people could have influence over his secular humanist past and present. While you're at it show how Donald Trump has any desire to embrace the Constitution of the United States.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

ACW is s demon possessed pervert whose goal is the election of those that will silence the gospel. Start a thread about nazis and the DNC, and he carries on about Trump. That is called a red herring.

I know this article will be over your head, but for those that actually know anything about politics and economics, Donald Trump is attempting to out-liberalize Hillary Clinton.

Trump to announce fully tax-deductible childcare in economic speech

8-8-16

Donald Trump will announce in a major economic speech on Monday that childcare payments will be fully tax deductible under a Trump administration, a senior aide told The Hill on Sunday night.

"We're going to help working parents by making childcare payments fully tax deductible.

"That's new policy," the aide added.

Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton has said she would make child care costs more manageable through steps including tax relief and increased federal funds. She has pledged to work to cap child care expenses to no more than 10 percent of a family's income.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...-speech/ar-BBvmOJX?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

Notice how your candidate hasn't proposed any legislation that would strengthen the nucleus of society: marriage and the traditional family.