Antipope Francis makes divorce and ‘remarriage’ in the Counter Church even faster...

RCLady

New member
Antipope Francis makes divorce and ‘remarriage’ in the Counter Church even faster, easier with radical reforms

September 9, 2015

Independent.co.uk reports:

Pope Francis has radically reformed the Catholic Church’s process for annulling marriages, allowing for fast-track decisions and removing automatic appeals in a bid to speed up and simplify the procedure…

Francis’ biggest reform involves a new fast-track procedure, handled by a bishop, that can be used when both spouses request an annulment or don’t oppose it. It can also be used when other proof makes a more drawn-out investigation unnecessary.

It calls for the process to be completed within 45 days…

Another reform is the removal of the appeal that automatically took place after the first decision was made, even if none of the parties wanted it. An appeal is still possible, but one of the parties must request it — a simplification that was used in the United States for many years.

The reform also allows the local bishop, in places where the normally required three-judge tribunal isn’t available, to be the judge himself or to delegate the handling of the cases to a priest-judge with two assistants.

That measure is aimed at providing Catholic couples with recourse to annulments in poorer parts of the world, or places where the church doesn’t have the resources or manpower to have fully functioning tribunals…


http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/ Comment: As our material explains, in the true Catholic Church there is no such thing as an ‘annulment’ of a consummated marriage, but only a declaration of nullity that a certain union never was a marriage to begin with if there is clear-cut evidence proving that a particular union was not validly contracted. Such declarations (that certain unions were not actually marriages to begin with) were traditionally given very rarely. Such cases are extremely difficult to prove, and, if there’s a doubt about whether a particular union was a validly contracted marriage, the Church presumes the validity of the marriage.


Pope Leo XIII, Dum Multa (# 2), Dec. 24, 1902: “It follows then that the marriage of Christians when fully accomplished… cannot be dissolved for any reason other than the death of either spouse, according to the holy words: ‘What God has joined, let no man put asunder.’”


In the Vatican II sect, however, annulments are given out like hotcakes. They are almost always granted when requested. They serve as de facto divorce and ‘remarriage’. As an example, only 338 annulments were granted in 1968 in the U.S., when the pre-Vatican II teaching on marriage was still held by most. However, with the explosion of the post-Vatican II apostasy, the teaching of the indissolubility of marriage has been thrown out the window along with the other dogmas. From 1984 to 1994, the Vatican II Church in the U.S. granted just under 59,000 annually, even though the number of ‘Catholic’ marriages has fallen one third since 1965! Clearly, the Vatican II sect sanctions divorce and ‘remarriage’.


But even that pace of divorce and ‘remarriage’ in the Counter Church was too slow for the apostate Antipope Francis. In his new demonic documents, he has made it much easier for adherents of the Counter Church to abandon their marriages and pretend to enter new ones. He has fast-tracked the process, added new ‘reasons’ for seeking an annulment (such as abortion), and granted new powers to the local ‘authorities’. Previously, a second court had to confirm a decision. That has been dropped. Previously, there was an expense. Now it’s free. In some cases, the local apostate ‘bishop’ of the Vatican II sect can render the decision alone. It’s all about making divorce and ‘remarriage’ in the Counter Church even easier than it is. Here’s how one Novus Ordo paper summarized just some of the changes:


One sentence of nullity is enough.
One judge, under the responsibility of the bishop, is enough to oversee the process.
Under certain circumstances, each bishop can himself serve as the judge.
In case of the annulment being “evident,” there will be an even shorter process.
The local bishops’ conferences are called to help individual bishops through the reform process, and are called to help guarantee, save for the “just and decent remuneration of workers of the courts,” that the process be free of charge.
Appeal of a sentence, in case it’s required, can be dealt with locally (on the level of the nearest archdiocese), instead of taking it to the Vatican (http://www.cruxnow.com/church/2015/09/08/pope-francis-streamlines-process-for-granting-annulments/)


Even though only one sentence is required, if an appeal is made it can be handled by the nearest ‘archdiocese’. It’s no longer necessary to take it to Rome. Under this new arrangement, apostate ‘ordinaries’ of the Vatican II sect will be able to appease basically anyone who is unhappy in his or her marriage. Adherents of the Vatican II sect can wind up ‘unmarried’ within a mere 45 days of having complained to their ‘bishop’! This is sick. It’s all about the worship of man, never refusing what man wants and desires. Can you imagine how disastrous this decision will be on the local level of the Vatican II sect, where the apostate ‘bishops’ of the Vatican II sect stand for nothing and condemn nothing?! They will issue ‘annulments’ like they are handing out flyers! It’s a demonic attack on the Sacrament of Marriage. It’s another clear sign of the end times. It is nothing more than complete heresy – a rejection of Catholic dogma on the indissolubility of marriage. The antipope also promulgated his radical reforms via two ‘Apostolic Letters’ issued ‘motu proprio’. Those who accept this antipope are part of the problem and will follow him into the pit. People who continue to consider him the pope, in the face of the facts, mock the Church and the Papacy.


Moreover, this decision is of course causing more shock, outrage, and wonder among the followers of the Counter Church. It’s certainly another example of what we covered in this video – the true fulfillment of Apocalypse 17:8.

Apocalypse 17:8 Fulfilled


Here’s an article from our book on the Vatican II sect’s phony annulments, which have now gotten much worse with Antipope Francis’ latest apocalyptic move. The article gives examples of how true popes defended the indissolubility of marriage.

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/28_Annulments.pdf
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
whaddya bet before he's done he's made some arrangement to recognize homosexual unions, short of calling them "marriage"?
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/ Comment: As our material explains, in the true Catholic Church there is no such thing as an ‘annulment’ of a consummated marriage, but only a declaration of nullity that a certain union never was a marriage to begin with if there is clear-cut evidence proving that a particular union was not validly contracted. Such declarations (that certain unions were not actually marriages to begin with) were traditionally given very rarely. Such cases are extremely difficult to prove, and, if there’s a doubt about whether a particular union was a validly contracted marriage, the Church presumes the validity of the marriage

...

Here’s an article from our book on the Vatican II sect’s phony annulments, which have now gotten much worse with Antipope Francis’ latest apocalyptic move. The article gives examples of how true popes defended the indissolubility of marriage.

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/28_Annulments.pdf



You're only here to repeatedly link-drop to a sedevacantist monastery that's listed as a hate group by the SPLC.

Oh, and to be able to type antipope over and over again.


As for the annulments... good for the Pope.

He understands mercy, unlike those whose traditionalist trappings are woven with clericalism, authoritarianism, paternalism, misogyny, antisemitism and pride.
 

serpentdove

BANNED
Banned
As for the annulments... good for the Pope.

He understands mercy, unlike those whose traditionalist trappings are woven with clericalism, authoritarianism, paternalism, misogyny, antisemitism and pride.

Until death do us part Mt 19:6, Ro 7:2, 3 :idunno: Until a new skirt walks by :eek:linger:

326_when-a-buddy-cheats-or-is-cheated-on_flash.jpg
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
You know, the world doesn't revolve around the U.S. Thank goodness the pope understands that.

Here's the link to the OP article, which sedeLady forgot because she was too busy adding links to the sede monastery:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/p...annulments-with-radical-reforms-10491215.html
Francis has issued a new law regulating how bishops around the world determine when a fundamental flaw has made a marriage invalid.

Catholics must get this church annulment if they want to remarry in the church. But the process has long been criticized for being complicated, costly and out of reach for many Catholics, especially in poor countries where dioceses don't have marriage tribunals.

The reform also allows the local bishop, in places where the normally required three-judge tribunal isn't available, to be the judge himself or to delegate the handling of the cases to a priest-judge with two assistants.
That measure is aimed at providing Catholic couples with recourse to annulments in poorer parts of the world, or places where the church doesn't have the resources or manpower to have fully functioning tribunals.

In the document, Francis insisted that marriage remains an indissoluble union and that the new regulations aren't meant to help to end them. Rather, he said, the reform is aimed at speeding up and simplifying the process so that the faithful can find justice.

The overall aim of the reform, he said, "is the salvation of souls."


sedelady pretending the Pope is saying something he's not is dishonest.


Having said that, there are good reasons to differ with Catholic/(some) Christian belief regarding the indissolubility of marriage. I've seen some couples that should never have stayed together do so to the detriment of themselves and everyone around them. Let them make their decisions with their church or without their church, it's none of your concern.
 

Cedarbay

New member
There is no such thing as
emoticones_gestos_cruzando-los-dedos2_en.PlanetaEmoticon.com.gif
ex-husband,
emoticones_gestos_cruzando-los-dedos2_en.PlanetaEmoticon.com.gif
ex-wife. When two are married, God makes them one (Mt 19:6). Their covenant is in effect until one or the other dies (Ro 7:2, 3). :dead:

See:

Divorce & Remarriage: A Position Paper by John Piper
I didn't read the whole paper as it is very long. I agree that marriage is onto death.

The RCC does much damage in the annulment process.

Decades ago, one of my Mom's friends divorced, as a Roman Catholic. She remained single and did not seek annulment.

After thirty years, this woman and her husband renewed their vows, with her unbelieving spouse becoming a believer, through God's grace. It was a time of great rejoicing for all of us.
 

serpentdove

BANNED
Banned
[Marriage: one man, one woman for life (Mt 19:6, Ro 7:2,3)] "I didn't read the whole paper as it is very long. I agree that marriage is onto death."
Then you are rare, indeed (1 Ki 19:18).

"Decades ago, one of my Mom's friends divorced, as a Roman Catholic. She remained single and did not seek annulment. After thirty years, this woman and her husband renewed their vows, with her unbelieving spouse becoming a believer, through God's grace. It was a time of great rejoicing for all of us."
I know a local, formerly Catholic couple who overcame great obstacles. He was a philandering drunk. She kept the faith and prayed for him. He finally repented and they were
emoticones_gestos_cruzando-los-dedos2_en.PlanetaEmoticon.com.gif
remarried after
emoticones_gestos_cruzando-los-dedos2_en.PlanetaEmoticon.com.gif
divorcing.
 
Last edited:

Dan Emanuel

Active member
Marriage is for life. When Jesus said that divorce and re-marriage (to somebody new, while you're ex still live's) is verboten/invalid, He was underscoring and accentuating His previous point that "male and female" (Mark 10:6 KJV), in marriage, "are no more twain (two), but one flesh" (Mark 10:8 KJV).

He was saying that divorce is imaginary, make believe, pretend. "For the hardness of your heart" (Mark 10:5 KJV), God permit's civil/legal divorce. But its not a real dismemberment. The married couple go's on being 1 flesh, regardless of what else their doing. It is a colossal failure to divorce. It mean's something terrible happened. These two, who joined and became 1 flesh, can no longer live together with each other. Its sad, divorce.

I am at odd's with the papacy on marriage. According to Peters office of supreme pastor of the whole Church, the becoming 1 flesh is particular fulfilled during the matrimonial procreative act, but I believe that once the two have become 1 flesh, that a permanent, invisible change has occurred between/with the two, and metaphysically, they are now joined, physically, in some currently undetectable way.

Heaven see's those of us who are wed as a unit, in other word's (in other world's). Marriage is relevant only in this life, which make's sense since it is in and of itself a solution to the problem's that it solve's that are particular to these body's --male pettiness, possessiveness and jealousy that tend's toward violence, and his biological imperative to procreate. In our new body's, these thing's will not exist, and marriage's will have no meaning. We will know our former spouse's as equal's, as people, and people with whom we've had a special experience together while in this mortal coil.

So, in my view, your either wed, or your not. And the Church declare's nullity when they believe that your not. Its not that the Church make's you wed or not wed --the Church is trying to recognize reality. The Church has no metaphysical lens with which to examine every request for annulment. All the Church can do is what can be reasonably expected of people with limited knowledge of metaphysical reality.

This change in the Church, to me, place's more of the burden of proof upon those seeking formal annulment, to be open and honest about what they've done. The Church is not going to fact-check as much, which mean's, probably, that if you've had you're union annulled, and it shouldn't have been, that its because of you're own dishonesty. The Church doesn't have to hold you're hand when your promising to tell the truth by investigating the matter. "Are you wed, or not?" No, I don't believe I am; or yes, I am. If your validly married, you cannot have an annulment. Only you know the truth.

Tell it.


DJ
2.0
 

serpentdove

BANNED
Banned
...God permit's civil/legal divorce. But its not a real dismemberment. The married couple go's on being 1 flesh, regardless of what else their doing...
Jesus did not endorse divorce (Mt 19:18) or dismemberment (Ro 12:19). Men make it up as they go along (Judg 21:25).

See:

Vigilante Worksheet

As a reminder Dan Emanuel is number 12 on Satan, Inc. (TOL Heretics list) in "The 'Jesus is not God' people (Non-trinitarians) category. :burnlib:
 
Last edited:

Dan Emanuel

Active member
Jesus did not endorse divorce (Mt 19:18) or dismemberment (Ro 12:19). Men make it up as they go along (Judg 21:25).

As a reminder Dan Emanuel is number 12 on Satan, Inc. (TOL Heretics list) in "The 'Jesus is not God' people (Non-trinitarians) category. :burnlib:
You've got me as both a non-Trin and a saved-by-work's. Take you're time gathering all you're evidence you've got, and make you're best pitch that I'm either of those, or any heretic at all.


DJ
1.0
 

everready

New member
Daniel 7:25 And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.

He will think to change times and laws, not mans laws Gods laws.


everready
 
Top