antipas

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
antipas 2:13

who is antipas?

tertullian 225 mentions him
victorinus 303 does not
eusebius 340 does not

tertullian also knows about the seven churches
victorinus does not
eusebius does not

the only reasonable explanation for this
is
there were two different versions of the apocalypse

one that had antipas and the seven churches
and
the other that did not


back to
the apocalypse

what we are looking at could be the third version of the apocalypse
-all three written by someone named john
 

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
stp is recapitulating
-he really does not have much to bring to the table now
-his stuff in all in the future
-and it is anything he wants it to be
 

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
stp is recapitulating
-he really does not have much to bring to the table now
-his stuff in all in the future
-and it is anything he wants it to be

If it does not fit the past, it must be future.
It is the only option.
And you cannot leave out details to shoe horn it into the past.

Be honest in your approach.
 

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
If it does not fit the past, it must be future.
It is the only option.
And you cannot leave out details to shoe horn it into the past.

Be honest in your approach.

there is another option
-and-
that is change your interpretation
 

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
Top