Interplanner
Well-known member
Paul doesn't mean it the way that YOU attempt to pervert it.
Why is the normal meaning 'perversion'? I'm just extending the metaphor the way he did.
Paul doesn't mean it the way that YOU attempt to pervert it.
Why is the normal meaning 'perversion'? I'm just extending the metaphor the way he did.
No, you are not.Why is the normal meaning 'perversion'? I'm just extending the metaphor the way he did.
No, you are not.
Wrong.the metaphor is a temple and it was extended properly.
the metaphor is a temple and it was extended properly.
the metaphor is a temple and it was extended properly.
Wrong.
As you may know, I don't accept dictates from you. You have to provide reasons.
You also don't take facts as true. So what?As you may know, I don't accept dictates from you. You have to provide reasons.
Why don't you try reading it?Was Zech 14 about the ordinary Jerusalem, or about that which is described in Heb 11-13?
Why don't you try reading it?
Zechariah 14 is about the LORD Jesus Christ's return to the earth. It is describing the day of the LORD (Zech 14:1)
You also don't take facts as true. So what?
Why don't you try reading it?
Zechariah 14 is about the LORD Jesus Christ's return to the earth. It is describing the day of the LORD (Zech 14:1)
I have to be shown by reason not by RD SAYS that I'm not using the temple analogies of eph 2 or 2 cor 2 properly. Or I Cor 5's let us keep the feast. Reasons or shush.
Why does the critical doctrine of your D'ism come down to one of the passages NOT quoted out of 2500 in the NT? Boy that makes so much sense!
Of course I have read it. It just don't take i.net piccaninnies word for that it means a certain thing.
why, for ex., does the city get delivered, but that means the women are abused, and half the people are exiled. Wow, impressive.
Don't sound like an unshakeable place to me, which would be the one coming at the end of this world.
Why, if Christ is Lord, are we to divide the nations of the earth on their loyalty to Jerusalem?
don't mistake 'cartoon's for reality. He just means that God will be the victor on the last day, when the NHNE is made and evil ones go to the lake of fire.
According to YOUR version of "temple analogies", we are also made of bricks.I have to be shown by reason not by RD SAYS that I'm not using the temple analogies of eph 2 or 2 cor 2 properly. Or I Cor 5's let us keep the feast. Reasons or shush.
Invalid and illogical are YOUR "ideas" of what MAD is and says.Why does the critical doctrine of your D'ism come down to one of the passages NOT quoted out of 2500 in the NT? Boy that makes so much sense!
According to YOUR version of "temple analogies", we are also made of bricks.
The body of Christ has NO priesthood. Your ideas about Paul using the term "temple" to include a priesthood shows your vain imaginations.That's your literalism, or perhaps lack of imagination. We are living sacrifices. The temple is living. this is another entire area you are completely void.