musterion
Well-known member
2 John 1:10. Just tossing it out there on principle.
ECT According to Paul he was not the only one that preached the MYSTERY.
- Thread starter dodge
- Start date
2 John 1:10. Just tossing it out there on principle.
Right Divider
Body part
Thanks for your, in this case, ridiculous opinion.
God's Truth
New member
Thanks for the welcome back...the welcome back with some imperfections.
Truly though, thanks again.
God's Truth
New member
No problem.
This North American Mid-Acts Dispensationalist (Acts 9 aka M.A.D) believes EVERYONE has a right to their view.
To the memory of our countless young men and women in uniform who have given their very lives in their belief they were doing so to preserve that right.
God's Truth
New member
Amen.
Right Divider
Body part
Please show us the post where some MAD here said that some people have no right to their view.
Thanks.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
Raiding the mail?
If He had taught it then Peter's vision makes absolutely no sense. Especially not his response in said vision.
If Jesus had taught them it was OK then th vision wold have been unnecessary, and Peter would not have said, “Not so, Lord! For I have never eaten anything common or unclean.” [Acts 10:14]
Of course you do. :dog:
musterion
Well-known member
Oh, I can tell you a story or two that pretty much amount to that. But didn't happen on TOL.
Interplanner
Well-known member
Not the same issue.
Interplanner
Well-known member
Oh shut up. You also don't think faith v. sight is what the NT is saying, so why should I care what you say?
Rotfl
way 2 go
Well-known member
why don't you believe Paul when he says
the mystery is that the Gentiles should be fellowheirs
as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit;
Eph 3:6**That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel:
obviously not if we are going by what Paul said
That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs
but if we are winging it and truth
does not matter
dodge
New member
Paul taught NOTHING that Jesus did not teach before him. Yes, the message was hidden for a time, but Paul revealed nothing that Jesus had not already revealed. Why don't you believe Jesus ?
Jhn 10:16
And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
So Peter was a space cadet, what about that does not make sense?
I notice you didn't answer my question.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
What part of nothing from without a man can defile him escapes your grasp?
Interplanner
Well-known member
Way2Go:
you have to finish the sentence. The shared stuff and fellowship is not the mystery. Paul set up the sentence to put all the weight on "through the Gospel" (as opposed to through the Law/Judaism).
This is why:
1, all those things were mentioned in the prophets, and in the promise to Abraham
2, there is white hot friction when Judaism finds out the Gospel is the channel
you have to finish the sentence. The shared stuff and fellowship is not the mystery. Paul set up the sentence to put all the weight on "through the Gospel" (as opposed to through the Law/Judaism).
This is why:
1, all those things were mentioned in the prophets, and in the promise to Abraham
2, there is white hot friction when Judaism finds out the Gospel is the channel
way 2 go
Well-known member
why should we believe you when you
contradict the obvious
Eph 3:6**That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs