Who Posted:
Total Posts: 260
User Name Posts
Nang 54
Grosnick Marowbe 35
glorydaz 23
Rusha 22
IMJerusha 21
Town Heretic 15
S0ZO 13
bybee 11
Truster 10
Nick M 9
john w 8
resurrected 8
:think:
Who Posted:
Total Posts: 260
User Name Posts
Nang 54
Grosnick Marowbe 35
glorydaz 23
Rusha 22
IMJerusha 21
Town Heretic 15
S0ZO 13
bybee 11
Truster 10
Nick M 9
john w 8
resurrected 8
Boo, hoo......poor, misunderstoog Nag. Do you have a need to know?
And stuff your "You are unnecessarily disrupting a conversation I am having with Rusha" jazz, as you brought her into the conversation, and your Clavinism is a "disruption" to the gospel of Christ, and every last one of your satanic "posts" are a "disruption."
And, besides-my "disruption" was forordained/decreed.
So there-you taught me that.
Of course not. lain: That's why you're getting along so beautifully. She's obviously responding to a gentle approach of the sort so rarely found here among the faithful in response to...oh, nuts. You only a few posts removed all but called her a liar, chasing after the regard of some Christians.
And that was just the more recent example. So now we know what's standing between you and that contrite and different witness. The same thing that has you answer an entreaty to reconsider with:
Or state, boldy:
And the next question is: what are you going to do about it?
Or, again, she could be one loving word away ....
You are welcome to join our conversation ...
70 x 7did He wash the feet of non-Christians who had been rejecting Him for seven years?
Again, I've likely been on the petitioning side as much or more than I have on the responding side. So I wouldn't describe myself nor would anyone else accurately describe me as such.You are not examining all the evidence . . . Mr. Defense Lawyer.
I don't consider asking you to consider a) your stated goal and b) the problem of method and response in conjunction to be a "defense" of Rusha.Why the mounted defense on behalf of Rusha, alone?
So how she might respond (and keep in mind her response came after your flabbergasting claim to have offered no harm) controls your witness? Really?Rusha has repeatedly accused ME of lying, so I will wait for her apology. Besides she has revealed how she would not respond.
Now who's acting like a lawyer?There is nothing in scripture, saying we must be nice about unbelief.
I illustrated you doing a bit more than that in my last...I'm for contesting in defense of the word, but when you step beyond that to declare the sort of things I noted and quoted in my last, you're doing something else.Yes, we turn the other cheek, with God's strength, when the wicked try to harm us, but believers are not expected to be silent saps only to accommodate worldliness and evil.
Because you're a member of the body and my concern is about your witness and it being undermined by personal matters. It's about intent in relation to someone we should both care and be concerned about.Why are these questions and suggestions only coming my way?
Your honor is yours to do with what you will, Nang.Because you must protect your loyal groupies, I suppose . . .
conversely, she might be one harsh word away from being rudely awakened, especially if it was a wakeup call from one of her mush-headed buddies who are happily holding her hand on her way to hell
what's stopping you?
I'm thinkin' of not joining any more "reindeer games," in which that cranky old Nag "participates"(loosely employed here).
Rudolph John W.
Dear John,
Please reconsider. Your wit might be what it takes to direct Nang towards the light ...
I may, but I don't dig chicks, like Nag, that are the female version of Johnny Carson's "Grumpy Old Man" character on "The tonight Show."
You're going to feel pretty foolish, Res, when you find out Nang is the Pharisee and Rusha is the publican. What we have here is two women who don't know what they are. Nang thinks she knows God (but doesn't), and Rusha doesn't think she knows God, but actually does.
Luke 18:10-14
Two men went up into the temple to pray; the one a Pharisee, and the other a publican. The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican. I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess. And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner. tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.
Your honor is yours to do with what you will, Nang.
Sounds like a works based gospel you have there, Nang.Are you repenting from and confessing your sins?
Sounds like a works based gospel you have there, Nang.
Faith is a gift from God and repentance is granted by God, to His own.
Both come only by the grace of God, and are not earthly works at all.
Sounds like a works based gospel you have there, Nang.
...Because you must protect your loyal groupies, I suppose . . .
Good luck with that. lain:You betcha!
Is this true, Rusha? Are you repenting from and confessing your sins? Has God humbled you in this way, and are you now hoping to be exalted to glory in Him?