Is it focused light?You didn't simplify it. You were simply wrong.
Not what I asked. What does it do?Where are you going with this? The magnetic radiation can be focused using a convex lens. How does this have anything to do with the topic?
You do realize that my objections have only been to two things, right? And one of them was justified by someone other than you who said that light photons do have mass, just not any amount that can be measured effectively.Technically not. But in your case, I don't think you are either formally or informally educated in relativity, or even science beyond a highschool level (which is virtually nothing). I think you're basing your objections on misunderstandings, and this makes you incredulous to the explainations given.
Nope.You mean people who understand more about the subject under discussion than you?
I have had people who knew more about a subject explain the subject to me, and tell me that I am extremely intelligent because I understood it.
It is only people who have not explained a subject that have accused me of being unintelligent. Including people who have directed me to someone else's explanation.
And the only teachers who ever regarded me as not smart enough were the ones who were regarded by the majority of the student body who had ever been under them as extremely poor teachers, who were incapable of teaching the simplest basics of their subjects, let alone any other subject.
And that has actually only happened to me three times.
I am reading his posts. But if I weren't then it wouldn't be repetitive, would it?Why be repetative? Johnny is doing an excellent job (he knows more about it than I do anyway) and you won't even read his responses. I call that being intellectually dishonest.
Not with any proof.RE: Clete's posts.
Clete is merely rehashing, in short form, the objections from Bob Enyart. And these objections have been refuted.
You have yet to prove it.I've already explained to you how time is relative. So has Johnny. And we've both posted video's on it with superb graphical illustrations. Your response so far has been nothing more than "Pffffft. That's impossible. My common sense says so."
In fact, using the argument of someone at sea level and someone on a mountain I even asked a question. And no one answered it.
See above.What more do you want?!
So the relativity of time is unfalsifiable?:think:Foolish?! Field leading physists haven't been able to falsify relativity, but you can just because it doesn't make sense to you?! Do you realise how incredibly arrogant you are being?
The real problem is that they haven't verified it. You believe it because they haven't falsified it, and I don't believe it because they haven't verified it. So what's your problem?
Also, something I have learned in my life, the smarter someone is the more likely they are to think they know it all. To think their ideas are fact. To be too smart for their own good. Out of a sense of superiority, i.e. arrogance. And to then not think through the logic of their ideas. But, rather, use circular reasoning to support them.
And because they are so esteemed for being so smart the world simply assumes they must be right, so if anything seems to verify their theories they accept it, without questioning any other possible explanations.