You wanted (or at least, made it appear that you wanted) scripture that prohibits abortion, and that link contains all the scripture that prohibits abortion.What are you directing me to? What point are you trying to make?
Stuart
You wanted (or at least, made it appear that you wanted) scripture that prohibits abortion, and that link contains all the scripture that prohibits abortion.What are you directing me to? What point are you trying to make?
Stuart
By adding the word "should", you are adding intent to commit murder.So you believe a doctor should perform an 'accidental' abortion in the case where it is unavoidable?
Some people use G.O. as an abbreviation for genuineoriginal.Sorry, I'm not familiar with the abbreviation 'G.O.'.
I'll just reply by citing the entire internet, which discusses the merits of the interpretation of scripture on most topics.You wanted (or at least, made it appear that you wanted) scripture that prohibits abortion, and that link contains all the scripture that prohibits abortion.
Scripture, please. Specifically that abortion is not permitted.
Stuart
So then, what of a woman who, suffering severe mental illness and forced by you to take a pregnancy to term, is very likely to attempt suicide?By adding the word "should", you are adding intent to commit murder.
No, the doctor should not perform an "accidental" abortion, but if the death of the unborn child is unavoidable and the doctor is not doing a procedure where the sole intention is to kill the unborn child, then the doctor should not be considered guilty of murder.
Nobody that goes to an abortion clinic for an abortion is doing it for any other reason than to murder an unborn child.Because, when religious zealots are ranting outside an abortion clinic, they don't make much distinction between the different cases walking past them. So how would you feel in that situation? Your life is in danger and about to be saved because a foetus must be killed for you to live, and there are people shouting at you, condemning you in your time of desperate need?
That sounds very arbitrary. You are making the distinction on 'innocence'?
You must have opposed every war in which that the US has ever been engaged.
Stuart
Well, thank you. But you agree that the bible does actually discuss abortion?You are welcome to make your argument.
That is a symptom of a dysfunctional society, and is not a justification for murdering the innocent babies before they are born.So then, what of a woman who, suffering severe mental illness and forced by you to take a pregnancy to term, is very likely to attempt suicide?
I don't think abortion doctors are wicked, and I don't think the life-saving surgery they perform can reasonably be called wanton, and I don't think you appreciate what a deal it is for a woman to have an abortion, even without the ranting morons who picket the abortion clinics.In the minds of the wicked, this justifies the wanton killing of unborn children for any and all reasons.
Obviously the god character in the Torah commands people to be killed, and it is commonly accepted that if a person is an immediate threat to others' lives then killing might be right.
So, abortion specifically?
Stuart
I'll just reply by citing the entire internet, which discusses the merits of the interpretation of scripture on most topics.
Take that!
Stuart
Well, thank you. But you agree that the bible does actually discuss abortion?
Stuart
It's not really my problem what any of that means. Clearly thou shall not kill does not mean thou shall not kill, when a command is made to slaughter the Amalekites, and in fact almost the entire population of the earth (and many tens of other examples).How about a Scripture please that says what your are implying...that everything we need must have been written in Scripture? Is there a Scripture somewhere that specifically says that?
Since abortion is killing a human baby...I think "Thou shalt not murder" would suffice for Scripture.(Exodus 20:13)
What do you think "thou shall not kill" or "thou shall not murder" means exactly?
Peace.
Well, thank you. But you agree that the bible does actually discuss abortion?
Stuart
Leviticus 201:5 1 And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, 2 Again, thou shalt say to the children of Israel, Whosoever he be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall surely be put to death: the people of the land shall stone him with stones. 3 And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people; because he hath given of his seed unto Molech, to defile my sanctuary, and to profane my holy name. 4 And if the people of the land do any ways hide their eyes from the man, when he giveth of his seed unto Molech, and kill him not: 5 Then I will set my face against that man, and against his family, and will cut him off, and all that go a whoring after him, to commit whoredom with Molech, from among their people. |
Then you are a fool.I don't think abortion doctors are wicked
No abortion done in an abortion clinic is done to save a life., and I don't think the life-saving surgery they perform can reasonably be called wanton
I see you have the whole thing worked out in your head. If a doctor discovers that an ectopic pregnancy is going to kill the woman, then the killing of the foetus isn't intentional, even though the doctor begins a procedure that intends to remove the foetus, thus killing it.
You are making a desperate use of semantics, one that in the end will result in people being unnecessarily distressed, but not you of course.
Stuart
No, the ending of a marriage does not necessitate killing.
The ending of a pregnancy does.
Obviously.
Stuart
Why would that be relevant? We are not discussing other areas of life.Hmmm. I wonder how that logic of yours works with other areas of life?
Well, the woman's wishes will necessitate an abortion, if that is what she would like to happen. This is not an easy option, so I don't think you can put any sense of frivolity on it. It's harrowing, apparently, even without the ethically confused morons ranting outside the clinic.Abortion is "necessary" when a woman decides she "would like to".
What is the difference between slavery and working for a wage? Isn't it the conditions of work? Should humans have a choice of what happens to their own bodies, and lives? Shouldn't women have an absolute choice about what happens to their own bodies, and their lives?Could you explain why there was an end slavery in the U.S.? Slavery was legal.
Shouldn't we have said or say: Slavery is "necessary" whenever a plantation owner decides they "would like to" have slaves?
We still prevent people under the age of 18 from voting. Is there a justification for that?Why do we allow women to vote? Shouldn't we have said or say: Forbidding women to vote is "necessary" whenever men decide "they would like to" have it that way?
Yes, that is exactly what I am saying.Your term "end a pregnancy" is killing a developing human being. So your statement really is saying: "When a woman decides that she would like to kill a developing human being."
But specifically, why should we allow a pregnant woman to have her foetus killed? Because that is her choice, because it is her body, and you shouldn't have to have me come around to your house and demand your liver, because you have the choice over what happens to your body.Tell me. Why should we allow one person to kill another human being?
StuartSo there is no scripture that specifically bans abortion?