IMJerusha
New member
nah. i tried that. no reconsideration possible -atrol:
I think that depends on the situation, PJ.
nah. i tried that. no reconsideration possible -atrol:
Cain't we have our "little talk" on TOL w/o Sherm getting very sensitive? You reckon?
No, it's probably full again. It was getting close but I haven't been around long enough to tend to it...there. Now I've got forty some openings. Time for a nap.That happens quite often around here. :chuckle:
BTW, clean out your inbox.....or did you mean to send me an email and then block my ability to respond?
I am not keen on Christians that rip into each other over petty stuff. Neither Knight or myself are very fond of call out threads.
Poly said:john w said:"Take a chill pill before you continue."Poly said:Dear john w,
You have received a warning at Theology Online | Christian Forums & More.
Reason:
-------
Name-calling without cause
john w there's no reason for all of your hostility in this thread. Take a chill pill before you continue.
-------
Original Post:
https://xenforo.theologyonline.com/posts/4309806/
Can somebody teach john w to cite his sources properly? Please. Teach him how to use the quote function...
She misquoted me, sport. Pay attention. She's the one that is not using the quote function properly. I quoted her words from another thread, and she quoted me, as if I said it. Again, read, pay attention, or get smart, by growing a brain.
This is what I quoted her, as saying, from other threads:
"I do not sin..."-God'sUNTruth
Vs.
"Jesus said to repent of your sins, and Jesus said that after he died on the cross, rose from the dead, and sat at the right hand of the Father......We are not even saved unless we first admitted our sins and repented.
1 John 1:8 If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us.
That is about never being saved in the first place.
After we are saved, we have to forgive each other still."-God'sUNTruth
This is what she posted-post #3:
Quote:
Originally Posted by john w View Post
1 John 1:8 If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us.
That is about never being saved in the first place.
After we are saved, we have to forgive each other still."-God'sUNTruth
=it looks like I said "1 John 1:8 If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us.That is about never being saved in the first place.After we are saved, we have to forgive each other still..."
...when I was quoting her.
Can someone teach you how to spell, Jethro, and use proper English? Stay out of this thread, as you've added nothing to me, "hit and run" punk, or the body of Christ, but hot air.
And why don't you learn how to use the quote function?
See how that works, condescending one? Good.
Have a seat. You don't matter on TOL.
Warnings serve as a reminder to you of the forum's rules, which you are expected to understand and follow.
All the best,
Theology Online | Christian Forums & More
Oh. Original. Pay more attention, to what I was accused of, before you continue.
Knock it off or next time you'll be banned.
Me too.his "fault" is his exceedingly low tolerance for them, which I happen to share
I'm convinced TOL would benefit from the selective but permanent banishment of a good two dozen members from across the spectrum -- from theism to atheism and all stops in between -- whose one shared trait causes most of the pointless strife on TOL that leads to situations like this one (no, I do not count JohnW in that group...his "fault" is his exceedingly low tolerance for them, which I happen to share). Conversation on this site wouldn't suffer one bit with their absence but rather would be vastly improved for all who remain. JMO
I'm convinced TOL would benefit from the selective but permanent banishment of a good two dozen members from across the spectrum -- from theism to atheism and all stops in between -- whose one shared trait causes most of the pointless strife on TOL that leads to situations like this one (no, I do not count JohnW in that group...his "fault" is his exceedingly low tolerance for them, which I happen to share). Conversation on this site wouldn't suffer one bit with their absence but rather would be vastly improved for all who remain. JMO
Here...:noid:...here? :shocked:I'm convinced TOL would benefit from the selective but permanent banishment of a good two dozen members from across the spectrum -- from theism to atheism and all stops in between -- whose one shared trait causes most of the pointless strife on TOL that leads to situations like this one (no, I do not count JohnW in that group...his "fault" is his exceedingly low tolerance for them, which I happen to share). Conversation on this site wouldn't suffer one bit with their absence but rather would be vastly improved for all who remain. JMO
I agree with Sherman on this one. Lots of atheists participate here and have no trouble respecting the fact that this is a Christian run site. My name is Delmar and I aprove Sherman's message.
Send your donations to Mayor STP!!!
Don't worry saint john, as you know, Aunt Bea feeds the prisoners very well. Just a little longer and you will be back to carefree hours and peanut butter/jelly sandwiches.
In my not so humble opinion a site can be lively or not depending on how tolerant administrators are of minor offenses.Bump :surf:
In my not so humble opinion a site can be lively or not depending on how tolerant administrators are of minor offenses.
:chuckle:I'm convinced TOL would benefit from the selective but permanent banishment of a good two dozen members from across the spectrum -- from theism to atheism and all stops in between -- whose one shared trait causes most of the pointless strife on TOL that leads to situations like this one (no, I do not count JohnW in that group...his "fault" is his exceedingly low tolerance for them, which I happen to share). Conversation on this site wouldn't suffer one bit with their absence but rather would be vastly improved for all who remain. JMO