No need to waste your time, since---all your hand-waving protestations aside---its content stands precisely as posted, a fact that you prove unequivocally every time you complain about what people wear
perhaps you are retarded :idunno:
No need to waste your time, since---all your hand-waving protestations aside---its content stands precisely as posted, a fact that you prove unequivocally every time you complain about what people wear
Merely another Ad Hominem Fallacy on your part. Back to Post #8.perhaps you are retarded
Merely another Ad Hominem Fallacy on your part.
Nope, see Post #8.nah, it's my first ad hominem
Your ignorance is showing once again. It's an Ad Hominem Fallacy whether it's factual or not and, hence, it's entirely irrelevant.and it's only a fallacy if it's wrong
Nope, see Post #8.
Your ignorance is showing once again. It's an Ad Hominem Fallacy whether it's factual or not and, hence, it's entirely irrelevant.
What individuals may or may not believe is entirely irrelevant. The discussion concerns the formal teachings of the Catholic Church.Had the list header said THINGS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH DOES NOT TEACH, it might be of some little value. As it is, you can find individual Catholics who believe almost every item on that list. So your thread is kinda...self-stupidificating.
Post #8 applies to you as well.Da pope's getup actually makes the old sod's look understated. The fish hat makes it.
What individuals may or may not believe is entirely irrelevant. The discussion concerns the formal teachings of the Catholic Church.
. So your thread is kinda...self-stupidificating.
Post #60.already addressed and disproven see Post #59
Ad Hominem Fallacy.you're just not all that bright, are you?
Thanks for once again nicely proving my statements in Post #8.oh well, have fun worshipping your liberace-flamboyant-dress-wearing pope.
Post #60.
Ad Hominem Fallacy.
At the bottom: "17 Myths of Catholicism"Title of your borrowed graphic doesn't say that, genius.
No, #61 is just one of your Ad Hominem Fallacies. Try again.refuted by Post #61