Fertilised eggs are potential. Fertilised chicken eggs are potential chickens; fertilised human eggs are potential humans. Why this is difficult for anyone to understand amazes me.
Cause you have it wrong.
Fertilised eggs are potential. Fertilised chicken eggs are potential chickens; fertilised human eggs are potential humans. Why this is difficult for anyone to understand amazes me.
So let's focus on war, capital punishment, and genocide as well. And the life and care of human beings AFTER they are born.yeh, you hear this a lot... how a fertilized egg is potential life... will turn into human life...
PLEASE
It either is or it is not human life
by this kind of "logic" (choke, choke), you could say that a 20 yr old is more human than a 5 year old...
As they say
If it is alive, don't kill it
If it is not human, what is it?
++++
Cause you have it wrong.
Aha, yup right . . .
fertilised human eggs are potential humans. Why this is difficult for anyone to understand amazes me.
Genesis tells us that human life began when Adam took his first breath after God breathed into his nostrils.You're wrong, biologically speaking. When is the very beginning of each individual human life? You tell us...
Genesis tells us that human life began when Adam took his first breath after God breathed into his nostrils.
But because my comments and observations are often judged as blasphemous and disruptive, I might well be banned for pointing this out.
If he was, the literal text is not clear on that point is it?What was Adam prior? He didn't didn't exactly have a typical human development. He certainly was never a fertilized egg.
What, you don't like it when debate can no longer take place?
Diverse and authentic debate enlarges the pool of meaning. Diversity is healthy in a farmer's crop, a rain forest or a president's cabinet. Or any other population.What, you don't like it when debate can no longer take place?
I look at that story in terms of myth, which is the closest thing we humans have for explaining absolute truth.My point is that since Adam was created as a man, not as a baby, he has no bearing on the debate of when human life begins.
Diverse and authentic debate enlarges the pool of meaning. Diversity is healthy in a farmer's crop, a rain forest or a president's cabinet. Or any other population.
http://www.amazon.com/The-Wisdom-Crowds-James-Surowiecki/dp/0385721706
It is interesting that you seem to have mischaracterized my comments. I was not referring to debate at ALL !
I look at that story in terms of myth, which is the closest thing we humans have for explaining absolute truth.
I don't believe in people being created 6,000 years ago by a giant figure in the sky.
But nevertheless, the Bible has much to enlighten and teach us.
Not to some committed Christians. But if they insist on taking the sacred and holy language of their Bible literally maybe we should just try to meet them there.Agreed. Which follows that the topic of Adam is largely off-topic from the discussion of when human life begins...
Not to some committed Christians. But if they insist on taking the sacred and holy language of their Bible literally maybe we should just try to meet them there.
But what do I know?
You're wrong, biologically speaking. When is the very beginning of each individual human life? You tell us...Fertilised eggs are potential. Fertilised chicken eggs are potential chickens; fertilised human eggs are potential humans. Why this is difficult for anyone to understand amazes me.
Adam became living with that first breath.Agreed. Which follows that the topic of Adam is largely off-topic from the discussion of when human life begins...