Angry armed man epidemic.
It is a shame there weren't some armed men to
stop this shooter, looks like we need to sell
some more guns to the good guys....
Angry armed man epidemic.
An angry unarmed man might just work rather better? lain:It is a shame there weren't some armed men to
stop this shooter, looks like we need to sell
some more guns to the good guys....
No one cares about those people.
In America, fighting over personal opinions is far more important than the lives of our fellow citizens.
I don't support easy or illegal emigration. And I don't see what emigration has to do with there being yet another mass shooting.So you agree that we should take care of the homeless and poor citizens before debating whether immigrants should come pouring in to be taken care of
I agree that we need to solve our own problems before we go trying to solve everyone else's. Then again, we do have to prioritize. I may need a meal, but if my neighbor is about to be shot, his problem supersedes mine, don't you think?You mention self-righteousness: find it a bit odd that so many people want immigrants to come in, under the pretense that we should help others- but yet one isn't helping the man under the bridge right in one's own alley?
agree that we need to solve our own problems before we go trying to solve everyone else's.
I agree that we need to solve our own problems before we go trying to solve everyone else's.
If "Crucible" wants to claim that God is an American "conservative," perhaps he can direct misguided "liberals" to those Biblical verses that provide a moral justification for the 2nd Amendment or a version of "The Greatest Commandment" that endorses killing one's neighbor!Can you name a single nation where tyranny didn't occur?
I'll spare you the trouble and tell you none exists.
And you know what happened?
I'll spare you even more trouble- they trusted their government.
Liberals want government to be their god, and that's exactly what they get- a strict, ancient tyrant made out of gold.
Full Article
So now that we've had at least one mass shooting in a traditionally gun-obsessed state, where does that leave all the ammosexuals obsessed with the delusion of "the good guy with a gun"?
At least, assuming any of them remove their gun range earmuffs long enough to hear the news.
Or a brain. lain:Oh please. I wish people had a brain around here. The gun isn't the problem the person is. He could have done the same crap with a crossbow, ore even a rock.
If the problem is evil then no punitive notation on a book is going to impact it. If the problem is crazy then no speech, no law, no will is going to avert it. So what then is the role of law?People are evil...You make penalties for gun crimes harsher you will see those crimes go down. This is just common sense.
Okay, it's like this. Yes, you can kill someone with a knife or a rock, but it's infinitely easier to kill a lot of someones with a gun than with anything else.
If the problem is evil...
town said:then no punitive notation on a book is going to impact it.
If I had to choose between the government and the NRA, it wouldn't be "Crucible's" god - Wayne LaPierre!Can you name a single nation where tyranny didn't occur?
I'll spare you the trouble and tell you none exists.
And you know what happened?
I'll spare you even more trouble- they trusted their government.
Liberals want government to be their god, and that's exactly what they get- a strict, ancient tyrant made out of gold.
No, a great many more people die by the use of guns than anything on your list. A list you had to reach across years to sum for the impression.or maybe not
With rational people, sure. Most murders aren't rational acts. Most of the mass killing shooters meant to end their own lives as part of the process. Punitive measures won't impact crazy or evil.you don't think punitive measures have a deterrent effect?
No, a great many more people die by the use of guns than anything on your list.
.... it's infinitely easier to kill a lot of someones with a gun than with anything else.
to revisit, this was town's retarded statement to which i was responding:
Every town has a tard ?
:mock:town, the retard