It was the 18th century's equivalent of a tank :duh:
So I currently have the right to drive a fully armed (in case of emergency) cherry-red tank to work each morning?
It was the 18th century's equivalent of a tank :duh:
So I currently have the right to drive a fully armed (in case of emergency) cherry-red tank to work each morning?
constitutional right, as spelled out in the second amendment?
absolutely
So you think owning and using a fully operational and loaded tank is ... allowable per the 2nd ...
Yes, as long as you don't use it to break the law
Same with free speech. Shouldn't we have restriction on the 2nd?
Not interested in that part
Of course you're not... convenient selectivity's your go-to discussion tactic.
Just about to correct you. Right. It was a pistol with a large clip. The sort I oppose and there was a pretty good illustration as to why.The murderer in this case was former military, and he used an AR-15.
Except No!
It was a pistol.
And evasion and subject changing, appeals to emotion and opinion are yours
That's why I more often ridicule you than engage you
It's obviously not reasonable to drive a tank to work. You threw reasonableness in with "rights" to obfuscate. We are not obliged to agree with you in totality when you begrudgingly get one thing right.Of course you're not... convenient selectivity's your go-to discussion tactic.
It's obviously not reasonable to drive a tank to work. You threw reasonableness in with "rights" to obfuscate. We are not obliged to agree with you in totality when you begrudgingly get one thing right.
:mock: Quip.
It's obviously not reasonable to drive a tank to work.
Yep.I don't consider it reasonable to commute in one of these, but I knew guys who did:
and while it wouldn't have been safe in the hands of my elderly mother, the guys i knew drove them safely
Where do you draw the "reasonable" line Stripe...at a tank, RPG, AR-15?
Depends.
And ultimately: Doesn't matter.