No, I don't think that at all. Why? Because of all the testing on blood counts every treatment. There is no way an infection would have gone un-diagnosed.
Sure, I can see why you might doubt that.
You do understand how confirmation bias could make you expect a cure from the treatment and then, seeing remission, be confused about the origin of her recovery?
It's totally possible that her recovery was unrelated to her treatment, no?
for the past 100 years almost all cancer patients have been treated in one way or the other, such that the influence of treatment cannot always be excluded.
At least for small tumors the frequency of spontaneous regression most likely was drastically underrated. In a carefully designed study on mammography it was found that 22% of all breast cancer cases underwent spontaneous regression.[3]
Five years of cancer treatment. Countless conversations with surgeons, oncologists, radiologists, plastic surgeons and other medical staff. May you never be forced to learn as we were.
My relatives and friends have often taken a different path. I studied those alternative paths. My aunt had metastic colon cancer and she lived, despite not choosing any allopathic cures. Her colon was 100% blocked with a tumor (meaning she would take a high enema and couldn't run water past it at first) when she started her carrot juice fast, and she had a liver tumor started, too. After a month on carrot juice she had it on the run. (That was decades ago. She is in total remission and has been ever since.)
Another friend tried to go basically the same route as her and died. But before that I saw her go into remission temporarily. I was at her bedside just before she died. Her oncologist asked to see her body post-mortem because she was his first patient to actually die of the cancer she had.
And yes, we are extremely great flu to God for all the people and treatments He made available to us.
And I'm grateful adults don't have to be forced to take treatments they don't want.