Search results

I agree, I like the RSV, and a few others better. I'll switch to something else. I'll make a few comments on the verses as to what the other view is in relation to Mid Acts, later today. My website is my book on the Existence and Nature of God. My three short books are on my website. Book...

I totally agree with you on this and for the exact same reasons. I sometimes said, being a pastor for ten years, that people don't "lose" their salvation as if by accident, but more by willful rejection of the gospel. I think we agree that God alone will be the final judge. Ephesians 4 20 But...

Thanks for responding. Clete. I see you as a friend that I have more in common with than not. Your arguments are always very well structured and clear. I grew up in a Church world with a lot of differences and divisions, I have aways tried to appreciate as many views as possible with love and...

If Mid Acts means we can never lose our salvation then Mid Acts means we can sin with impunity--without fear of losing eternal life. --Dave

There is no acceptable causes in good debate for insults. Who decides what are a good causes and which ones are not. Everyone will always say they were justified to call some else an idiot. Now you're accusing me of not being sensible. You think you are right, and I'm only sensible when I...

I would rather have, are you really this dense, to be wrong for anyone to say.

I don't want an administrator to be able to say to me, are you really this dense, if I cannot say it back to him. Other wise you have a double standard. --Dave

Is it ok for me to say to you, or an administrator, are you really this dense? --Dave

"Ad hominem refers to several types of arguments where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion often using a totally irrelevant, but...

So when can I call the administrators dummies? --Dave

I will not answer or make any more comments on flat earth on this thread, this thread is not about that subject. Respect the topic of this thread. --Dave

There's obviously more than one way to insult someone; are name-calling and ridicule insults? --Dave

Knight ran this site the way a debate sites should be run. --Dave

Not according to the term and rules. See bottom page after Contact us. --Dave

It is an answer, like it or not, who are you that I (or anyone else here) needs to to bow to your terms? Just more arrogance. You mean that's why Clete is not buying my attempt, you're just a follower of Clete, with no mind of your own. I really don't care what Clete is buying, or you--Judge...

I certainly do not think that sin does not exist nor do I think that others who question the extent of God's grace in Mid Acts think that. Romans 6:1, "What shall we say", implies Paul is also asking the same question along with others, or else he would have said, how should we answer those who...

Not surprised you put yourself above the terms and rules for this site. --Dave

Earth, from earth, is flat and stationary. The earth from space above the stratosphere is a globe, so long as everything we are told by science is true. The earth spinning and moving around the sun is empirically unverifiable, but very possibly true. Flat earth arguments were never my arguments...

Read my quotes in post #151, they are an answer to your false accusations. We can deal with this in another thread, if you like. I expressed my true motives, my true concerns, and true dilemma--a situation where a person is torn between two or more conflicting moral (in this case theological)...