Search results

I don't belong here.

No. But comments like the NASB is corrupted is telling. The software I typically use allows me 50+ bibles, commentaries, dictionaries, not including the ones I have physical copies of. Hardly. I don't have a specific translation. I've read the KJV, NASB, NIV, et al. Currently, I spend more...

Not my intent. But the King James Only believers are clearly following the false teaching that the TR-Only or KJV-Only are the only reliable bibles. Now I see what false beliefs I'm up against.

So you are deny the scripture: (Jeremiah 4:23) I looked on the earth, and behold, it was without form and void; and to the heavens, and they had no light. [ESV] By denying this scripture, you're stating that God used existing materials instead of creating them from nothing. By reconciling...

I prefer the most accurate translation of the Bible, which is not the Young's Literal Translation. I don't bow down at the altar of the KJV-Only Cult either since it is also flawed. The only way to arrive at the truth of God's word is thru a careful study of hermeneutics.

The commentaries mentioned are my favorites, but by no means my only commentaries. I bought my Unger's about 40 years ago and is extremely hard to find. You can get the Bible Knowledge Commentary and Jamison-Faucett-Brown for e-Sword as well as many others fine commentaries.

I suggest you look at Biblical Commentaries like Unger's Commentary Old Testament (2 Vols), Bible Knowledge Commentary (2 Vols), etc. Consider (Jeremiah 4:23) I looked on the earth, and behold, it was without form and void; and to the heavens, and they had no light. [ESV]

I've already provided the information you request in previous posts. I've been called a number of names, whether you did or not, I'm not going to waste time going through my posts. The important science is the age of the earth and universe. I've already provided ample information via links...

How do you know my reason for accepting an interpretation at odds with YEC? Must I accept YEC to be saved? Why are YEC so vicious?

Well, I've been called a lot of names so far in this thread and no one has stuck up for my right to have an accepted recognized Christian opinion. If people can't make a point without name calling, their point is not worth reading. I have been following the cults since I read my first Walter...

Source: Christianity and the Scientific Method

Bask in your own ignorance. I believe in what God wrote, not how your cult interprets scripture to blind people from the truth.

Your understanding of this text is in error. Source: Exodus 20

What you wrote is irrelevant so I didn't read it.

There were no books written or in existence when the Book of Ecclesiastes was written.

I have no problem with the scripture you quoted. I have a problem with your biased interpretation to support your chosen cult of YEC.

(Genesis 1:1) In the beginning of God's preparing the heavens and the earth— (Genesis 1:2) the earth hath existed waste and void, and darkness is on the face of the deep, and the Spirit of God fluttering on the face of the waters, [Young's Literal Translation] Since you appear to be...

Because the Bible is being misinterpreted by the YEC cultists.

Genesis 1:1, etc. The word for Earth can also be translated as land. This is important to note especially elsewhere. As for reclamation, there are whole books written about the subject. Unless you're going to pay me to educate you, I'll leave you to study that on your own.

I wrote that because of the unscientific statements YEC make that are NOT supported by science, yet they say they are supported by science making them out to be liars. I am not calling you a liar just to be clear. Unfortunately, your best argument is a misinterpretation of the word "yom"...