Search results

i'll agree that it was a response, but it wasn't a rebuttal :think: perhaps a course in remedial english is in your future

yes, it really is - i dint ask a question, so the response you gave as an answer really was an answer to a question that wasn't asked go ahead and look again - see if you can't figger it out

that's an answer to a question nobody asked :idunno:

simple the other guys ran an even worse candidate

:think:

i'll let somebody else waste their time trying to get the bananahead to understand the difference between using weapons to protect your rights and using weapons to attack others

eeeeeeek! those bad men have scary looking guns!

time to hit the bottle, drunky?

no, you alcoholic retard, it's your opinion that i'm a troll

again, this is just your goofy opinion and worth nothing more than the goofy opinion of an alcoholic retard why should i care about the goofy opinion of an alcoholic retard like yourself?

in your opinion, which is the opinion of a drunken retard again, why should i care what your goofy opinion is?

why should i care whether you think i'm a troll? :idunno:

why should he care whether or not you take him seriously?

why? why does he "need to do better than this"?

you'd think he might be humbled by the fact that people here reject him so readily but no - he just uses it as an opportunity to mock you and stroke his own ego which is, of course, at the root of why so many people here reject him so readily

the dramatic upward trend occurs in the mid to late sixties :think: when was that highly touted "civil rights act" passed again?

negroes?

it's called a "literary device" you retard