Search results

How do you know he's using a fisheye.

No. He would have kept posting right along regardless. Probably would have claimed the lack of response proves F.E. to be true.

Well you just did. Such a simple observation, too. I already tried putting myself in the shoes of a flat earther and tried to come up with an alternative explanation for what high altitude cameras always reveal -- and equidistant horizon no matter where the launch point. I can't come up with...

Interesting. http://www.christianheadlines.com/columnists/breakpoint/the-silent-suffering-of-gay-men-an-unspoken-epidemic.html

You just ended this thread. /

:think: Your point is irrefutable.

That is a VERY good point. Wherever a camera is shot from, when it gets high enough the horizon is always equidistant, as you say. That would not be possible on a flat Earth. Unless the launchpad was DEAD CENTER of the flat Earth, and the camera remained DEAD CENTER over the flat Earth, the...

You already posted a ton of video saying there's NO curvature. And if his camera was seeing the purported circumference of the earth from only 100k feet up, the flat earth is WAY smaller than you think.

http://christiannews.net/2017/04/10/ohio-ministers-arrested-on-sex-trafficking-charges/ Not just that, either... http://www.toledoblade.com/Police-Fire/2017/04/08/Toledo-pastor-2nd-man-accused-of-sex-with-teen.html Between them, I bet these two claimed every sign gift in the Bible.

Um...the what?

That video shows curvature.

https://heatst.com/entertainment/marvels-latest-x-men-comic-features-coded-anti-semitic-anti-christian-references A Muslim artist drops some subtle references into artwork for X-Men (which has long been Marvel's most consistently proggy title). Marvel says it's pulling the artwork and is...

...didn't Obama say there'd be military consequences if Syria crossed the line and used chem. weapons?

Well, like I've said before...eclipses, moon phases and orbits just won't work apart from the heliocentric global model. Feel free to disagree with that.

That's saying you're not quite convinced, but man you sure come across as if you already are. And to tell the truth -- you don't respond squarely to a lot of the objections you get here. That also makes people think your mind is already made up. In which case it seems you're just screwing...

Fine. So tell the truth. Which position do you lean toward? Globe or Flat? Asking because you've said before you're just playing Devil's advocate for the Flat side, but you seem more invested in it than that.

"If" ? Either it is or it isn't. Which is it?

http://www.odditycentral.com/art/artist-who-experiences-sounds-as-colors-paints-popular-songs.html#more-56869 I want to see her representation of John Cage's 4:33.

I did not know that.

The experts can correct me on this... An object in a stable orbit about the globe is constantly falling toward the surface at the same rate the curved surface falls away from the object. So instead of the momentum of its straight line trajectory carrying it off into space, the pull of gravity...