Search results

Cult members at Waco shot down Texas National Guard helicopters with Barrett 50 Cal sniper rifles

That is not an answer to my question.

Sure you did I quoted you

What degree of ineffectiveness is acceptable?

Your hero 😘

Charged with aggravated assault. Frustrating. Perp twice stomped on the victim's head. Should be charged with attempted murder, 1st degree

The guy you think was the greatest president

Good for you 😘

Half a million on the southern border since Joe the Rapist took office

Who? :idunno:

If I drove home drunk last night, uneventfully, what risk/danger did I pose? In an analysis of that single completed action, none.

61 year old me. Didn't get the vaccine, didn't get sick, didn't die. Also me, over the past year - didn't get a sniffle.

Of course. But I haven't been walking on the edge of a high cliff this past year. Nor have I almost slipped and fell

Maybe you could understand it better if I added this to it: It has been more than a year now and the CALCULATED danger to me from the disease caused by the virus is 0, SO FAR.

Tatum is hilarious! 🤣

I didn't say "risk" But you can calculate the risk IN THE PAST in the same manner, from known values. In my individual case, the known incidence of disease has been zero, therefore the risk to me over the past year has been zero.

I divided the number of days I suffered from the disease caused by the virus by the number of days since the virus arrived.

It has been more than a year now and the danger to me from the disease caused by the virus is 0. The danger to me from the vaccine is also 0. Decades from now I'll be telling my grand children that the most dangerous thing about the Kung Flu virus was the way it made leftists insane. And...

If 300,000 people die from the vaccine, that's acceptable?