Search results

Suez Canal is 120 miles long and is level from end to end https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photo-view-to-earth-red-sea-suez-canal-window-metres-flying-height-above-sea-level-airplane-image60898688 --Dave

Take two aspirin, watch 6 min of the video I just posted and then comment. This thread is not only a theoretical proposition, visual evidence is required. And yes video can be altered. You can decide for yourself who you think is faking their videos, NASA or flat earthers. But you cannot make...

In the first "6 min" this video proves it's two main points. The horizon is completely flat 360 degrees to the observer regardless of altitude which would not be possible on a globe earth. The natural physics of water is to seek and maintain it's own level. The curvature of the earth is 8...

I'm the one who stared this tread, not you. I proposed a viewing of a few videos which you and others have consistently "dodged". Did you bother to look at the last video I posted and comment on it? You're the dodger not me. I'm leading this thread not you. --Dave

Matthew 5:22 whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire. " --Dave

Most if not all your posts are irrelevant to the thread. --Dave

I watched the myth busters and was simply not persuaded. The foot print test sided with my view. --Dave

Eye Direction and Lying http://www.blifaloo.com/info/lies_eyes.php Can Neil Armstrong pass this lie detection test? Watch and see this 12 min test. --Dave

In summary here are 5 moon landing contradictions 1. No moon dust located on lunar module pads yet astronauts are seen kicking up lots of dust. 2. Well defined foot prints would suggest moisture on moistless moon surface. 3. Well defined foot prints on surface with granny particles of dust or...

Here is a 4 min video of astronauts kicking up moon dust. See it for your self and then try to tell me that the module did not do the same if not even more so. --Dave...

TRW Incorporated's artist concept depicting the Apollo 11 Lunar Module (LM) descending to the surface of the moon. https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasa2explore/9352710092/in/set-72157634767563484?ytcheck=1

Maybe the men went to the moon but the module did not? :rotfl: --Dave

The point is that the astronauts in comparison to the module kicked up the dust or sand, but the module that was much heavier, did not kick up any dust or dirt when it landed. It would be impossible for the men to do what the module could not do. I thought you smart enough to understand this...

The answer is this module never went to the moon no matter who says it did. --Dave

There would be some dust or dirt on the pads of the module and some hole or small crater under it. About that bridge... --Dave

Back to our subject. Astronauts who kick up dust, dirt, or what ever is supposedly on the surface of the moon, and a lunar modal landing that did not is a clear contradiction and evidence that the event was staged and no one went to the moon. --Dave

All cosmological theories require a presupposition that may or may not be true. No human was present at the beginning of the universe and life, no one can say with absolute certainty that the universe and life have a beginning. No one has been in a black hole, no one has seen dark energy or...

Can any one disagreed with Newton? Copernicus? Einstein? Hawking? Tegmark and Guth? Which cosmological theory do you fully understand and accept? Steady state, big band, relativity, string, bounce, quantum, multi universe. How about creation and intelligent design? --Dave

I once thought the entire Bible was myth and that everything evolved and God did not exist. I decided early on to investigate both sides of every issue. Take some time to research the flat earth model and see what evidence they present and compare the two models from every issue. The distance...

Funny how none of it got on the LEM when it landed. It was on the astronauts shoes but not on the landing pads. --Dave