Search results

2001 Space Odyssey-1968 --Dave

2001 Space Odyssey 1968 When you see the film 2001 Space Odyssey made in 1968 it's very clear that the technology in film making was more than adequate to fake the moon landing. --Dave

I was joking about the Russians. First Moon Landing 1969 --Dave

The illustration is not to scale, it gives us the concept, that's all. It's a fallacy argument to make your case based on a illustration and not the actual way we see this, which is what the time laps videos do. You have to judge the time laps video to make your argument. Your point may still...

The government won't let any one go there. --Dave

It's not easy to say the king has no cloths on, I want the naked truth. If the Russians can rig a US election faking a moon landing would be a walk in the park. --Dave

Now that's a good argument and I will include it in my summary. I don't know how to answer all the questions and I never intended too. I wanted both views to be argued and compared, I have to evaluate all this now and see how it all plays out in my head. I'm not worried about which view others...

I'm not committed/married to any theory at this time. My life on earth and my home in heaven does not depend on my cosmological preference, and neither does your's. All three views, heliocentric, geocentric, flat earth, will be represented when we get there and then we all will know for sure...

No, Even on a globe an orbit is a circle just as on a flat earth, it's a very very big circle. --Dave P.S. But yes it is a big problem for flat earth.

Yes, there would be lots of lies. --Dave

That's like asking what kind of evidence would convince me my wife is cheating on me. My answer would be I'm not married. --Dave

If you have read this thread well enough you would also know that there is a dispute about the evidence for the globe model and good evidence for a flat earth that I have presented. If you think you can provide evidence for the globe model that has not yet been presented then do it. I am...

The sun moves from east to west in both models. There has never been a difference in any of the three models in this respect. --Dave

You are clearly personally biased about this subject, I don't fault you for that at all. I can understand now how you feel about the moon landings. I hope you know that I would never deliberately insult you or your Dad in any way. I don't know how to respond to you, I like the debate but not at...

Well now you know I'm only human. Glad I put a smile on that face of your's. I'll go the beach and look at the sun set but today I have to shovel snow. --Dave

Good point, I stand corrected. Although, there are astronomers who are also into astrology. But now you have evidence that "astronomy" is not my strong point. --Dave

The distance and the time it took was the point of that and not the exact size and exact location of the continents. --Dave P.S. And I would not rest my case on this either or any other single argument.

I was studying the new trends in cosmology at a site called Closer to Truth, which is also a TV series. I highly recommend it. https://www.closertotruth.com/ And in my study of Einstein's space time and the multi universe theory, I came across the flat earth model as well, which of course is...

Thanks, But let's keep to the subject here. --Dave

I'm looking at this from both sides. You'll have to be patient until I make my conclusions, which I'm already preparing. Again, astrology is not my thing, so I have to put work into this. --Dave