Search results

The horizon line blocks what goes beyond it and is below it. Ships, landscapes, and cityscapes are perpendicular and never slant away from the viewer at distances which would be the case if there was a curve. Ships never disappear bow first as they should if the earth were curved. Ships also...

Or maybe a flat circle, not a perfect circle though. --Dave

Distance --Dave

All flying shows a flat stationary earth or we would not be having this debate. That globe earth appeals to the sun to prove a moving globe is counter intuitive. Because we live on the earth one would think that we would be able to know the shape of it from it and not from moving sun, moon and...

--Dave

I can't make you or anyone else consider how the path of the sun would work on the flat earth model covered by a dome, but you can't debunk what you have not even looked at. I'm no fool for investigating and trying to understand flat earth any more than the space time block universe or...

The rays of the sun are not like railroad tracks. We know railroad tracks are parallel because see that at our feet right in front of us. The rays of the sun are not parallel because they merge at a distant point whereas railroad tracks do not merge in the distance. The appearance of merging...

I'm compiling a list of what we observe and how it is explained from both flat and globe perspectives. You, and others, have provided the globe perspective and I have researched and presented the flat earth perspective with some help from others as well. I wanted this to be a debate and a...

Eric Dubay: Star Trails Explained Here is good explanation from the flat earth perspective on this. Please remember I'm not saying it's correct. I spend hours watching video from both perspectives on this. --Dave

The globe earth model denies; 1. the existence of perspective 2. horizons we cannot see beyond 3. a limited viewing distance 4. horizons at eye level 5. that water is level. The study of art is the study of nature as it truly is. --Dave

Sun rays are never parallel. The one proof argument from the suns, etc. path just does not explain the whole earth. I just don't see that putting all my money on that one argument will win me the whole pot. It's a good argument, but there is just other arguments/facts that contradict this one...

There is a dome over flat earth and that is what determines how the heavenly bodies move over a flat earth. That the sun, moon, and stars are planets has been challenged. Electromagnetism is also a factor to consider. --Dave

Are you trying to make another argument? I thought one was enough. --Dave

If there was only one aspect to this debate, and only one short video was all the evidence we had, then you might be right but since it's not, the only thing that's finished is your participation with your one argument. --Dave

Good find Patrick. Here is a good video on how the dome affects what we see in the paths of the celestial bodies over a flat earth. --Dave

I noticed that the sun moved left as well. But one short video does not make the whole case for either side. I have always said that both sides, flat vs globe, have good points. Flat earth has a small sun that is very close to the earth as opposed to the heliocentric model, but the flat earth...

The lines drawn do not affect what you see in the video. The sun sets bottom first on a flat earth as well. --Dave

Flat Earth - Lunar Eclipse 2018 - Moon not a Sphere? The shadows we see are on the moon are only possible if the moon is a flat disc. The entire surface of the moon being as bright on the edges as it is in the middles is possible only if the moon is self-illuminating. See how a study of...

Your short video does not speak enough words. --Dave