Search results

The gravitational pull of the sun would be weaker if the earth moves farther away and stronger when earth is pulled closer. --Dave

I've been "told", not "shown" how gravity works, and it makes no sense, and when that's the case an appeal is always made to "the hand of God" as if that answers and justifies the inconsistencies/contradictions. --Dave

Not in the model with a dome. --Dave

The "Unmoved Mover". --Dave

The obvious problems with heliocentrism We have a spinning earth with a tilted axis, orbiting a sun in an elliptical path, in a galaxy that travels through space without varying. This model is an irrational construction Logically an axis would be perpendicular, not tilted, to its path...

The whole globe model certainly begins with the heavens. That the sun, moon, and stars tell us about the earth instead of the earth telling us about itself is classic Greek philosophy The Greek philosophers also flipped knowledge of God. Biblically, God reveals himself, but in Greek philosophy...

I look at all video and and view all the links that you all post, I expect you to do the same. When I don't know how flat earth answers your questions then I say so. But I don't just ignore it, I study it. I know way more about Copernican heliocentrism then I did before I started this thread. I...

That's a better question. We know that parallel line do not cross or actually meet in the distance. I thought your first question was could they "appear" to cross in the distance but not actually cross. If there are conditions that could make them appear to do that I am personally not aware of...

I don't know, never heard that before. I'd have to flip a coin to answer you. --Dave

Take a look at some of the flat earth video and pics and see for yourself how it all works from that perspective. --Dave

And proves neither flat nor globe earth. --Dave

The theory that the earth is a globe obviously negates perspective and causes the mind not to see it. Think flat earth, imagine it even if you don't believe in it, and you will then understand perspective and how it answers your question. --Dave

The targeting of a microwave 124 miles away is not a proof of a flat earth? Perpendicular ships and cityscapes in the distance are not a proof of a flat earth? You can question my mind and my motives but you cannot question what we all see on earth from earth. --Dave

Above the horizon with perspective means not near the water, not even close. Globe earth must entirely reject that perspective exists. --Dave

We live on earth and we should be determining the shape and nature of earth from earth. That globe model continually appeals to the heavens makes one wonder how in the world does anyone have certain knowledge of earth by looking up there instead of down here??? Experiments by valid men of...

Sun, moon, and stars are close and small and not far away on flat earth model, compared to globe earth model. The heliocentric model presumes the stars are millions of miles away. I know that NASA and Star Trek say differently but sadly moon landings were no more real than Buck Rogers...

No, that's not the logical conclusion given the distance and that the atmospheric conditions over water prohibit a viewing distance that looking up into the sky does not. --Dave

No, I don't have one but I have priced them. The new P1000 is coming soon and I may wait for that one instead. --Dave

The old jelly bean test, wow, how could I have missed that one. I surrender. The obvious perpendicular aspect of ships and buildings, etc. in the distance is proof that there is no curvature of the earth if ever there was a singular proof. This pic which is supposed to demonstrate a...

I didn't just put up a picture, I linked to another debate site on this so others could read it. I don't post just for you, I hope others read it. I don't know that we have any real knowledge about the sun, moon, or stars today. I'm not just content to have explained any one specific thing as...