Who?
I notice that twice now you have refused to engage regarding the fundamentals.
I know the answer to the base question on our side. What is the answer on yours?
Why is the Earth flat?
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Pass.
The number of people who believe a thing really is irrelevant, not to mention boring beyond belief.
Ask them. You seem to think they're everywhere. The only one I can find is you. :idunno:
But pictures from NASA don't count, because... reasons. :idunno:
No, it's not worth any time. As I...
He thinks NASA is his enemy. :Plain:
The conversation is a waste of time solely because Dave declares himself a non-believer in the flat-Earth myth.
It's bizarre because he then defends their ideas without a hint of irony.
If this were a serious scientific debate, we would look at the...
This is an irrational response.
That things are debated is not to conclude that they must be difficult.
Try responding rationally.
When the Bible talks about the four corners of the Earth, it is simple to see that this is not to be taken literally.
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
It's pretty simple.
It's just reading.
For instance, when the Bible talks about the four corners of the Earth, that's not literal.
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Are you going to defend every idea?
Big deal. :idunno:
There's no debate on this site about a lot of stupid ideas.
That's a good thing.
The basis of a healthy debate is that a defense is raised of a tenable idea. With your approach, we could be arguing over literally anything, no matter how...
So do Darwinists. So does every group of believers. Are you going to defend every idea?
Therefore you're going to defend the idea that the Earth is flat?
You're not making much sense.
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
...is both left and wrong.
Basically, you can never be "too" right, or a "right-wing extremist."
I mean, what could be wrong with being right?
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Liberals are extremists.
Conservatives are pansies.
For those willing to deal in rational terms, you could reasonably be called a fundamentalist. I mean, what's wrong with sticking to the fundamentals?
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk