Search results

Wot? Not in a democracy. That's not much of an argument. If a group describes itself as white supremacist, I do not have any argument with it regarding their characterization. However, that has nothing to do with what I said. Anyone who uses a phrase such as "white supremacy," "white...

Clearly, you have a mere passing affinity with it. That's nice. Now, have you got anything more convincing than a count of the number of people who agree with you and a debate over semantics?

Why? Because you cannot understand simple concepts conveyed in standard English? If someone uses the phrase "white supremacy" to describe a democratic society, they are a racist.

That's right. Of course it does. You've been sucked into the idea that because a lot of people believe something, it must be true.

Ah. It's another one of those insane conspiracy theorists who think that the US election was not stolen.

Anyone who unironically uses phrases such as: "Systemic racism," "White supremacy," "white privilege" etc.

Science is the process of throwing out ideas because evidence, logic or reason make them impossible.

Like Brain says. For example, they're all pro-abortion, pro-homo socialists.

That's a contradiction in terms.

Now I know why you got banned so often. :D

Trump is a leftist.

You hit snooze?

Oh, no! Free speech!!!

The vaccines are driving the pandemic

The "complication" being the vaccine?

Oh, no. Words.

Replacing it with the totally moral and not in any way evil two-child policy. Screw you, buddy.

Over my dead body!

But you do want the US to keep killing babies. Also, by not wanting to overthrow the CCP, you want it to keep forcing abortions.

:darwinsm: